Difference between revisions of "Class Journal Week 8"

From LMU BioDB 2013
Jump to: navigation, search
(Finally Fixed Formatting)
(adding questions)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
#Look at the methods and results described in the Merrell et al. (2002) paper. Do you think there is sufficient information there to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not?  
 
#Look at the methods and results described in the Merrell et al. (2002) paper. Do you think there is sufficient information there to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not?  
 
#*
 
#*
 +
 +
=='''[[user:HDelgadi|Hilda Delgadillo]]'''==
 +
 +
#What were the main issues with the data and analysis identified by Baggerly and Coombs? What best practices enumerated by DataONE were violated? Which of these did Dr. Baggerly claim were common issues?
 +
#What recommendations does Dr. Baggerly recommend for reproducible research? How do these correspond to what DataONE recommends?
 +
#Do you have any further reaction to this case after viewing Dr. Baggerly's talk?
 +
#Look at the methods and results described in the Merrell et al. (2002) paper. Do you think there is sufficient information there to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not?
 +
 +
 +
[[User:HDelgadi|HDelgadi]] ([[User talk:HDelgadi|talk]]) 15:58, 17 October 2013 (PDT)

Revision as of 22:58, 17 October 2013

Lauren Magee

  1. What were the main issues with the data and analysis identified by Baggerly and Coombs? What best practices enumerated by DataONE were violated? Which of these did Dr. Baggerly claim were common issues?
  2. What recommendations does Dr. Baggerly recommend for reproducible research? How do these correspond to what DataONE recommends?
  3. Do you have any further reaction to this case after viewing Dr. Baggerly's talk?
  4. Look at the methods and results described in the Merrell et al. (2002) paper. Do you think there is sufficient information there to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not?

Hilda Delgadillo

  1. What were the main issues with the data and analysis identified by Baggerly and Coombs? What best practices enumerated by DataONE were violated? Which of these did Dr. Baggerly claim were common issues?
  2. What recommendations does Dr. Baggerly recommend for reproducible research? How do these correspond to what DataONE recommends?
  3. Do you have any further reaction to this case after viewing Dr. Baggerly's talk?
  4. Look at the methods and results described in the Merrell et al. (2002) paper. Do you think there is sufficient information there to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not?


HDelgadi (talk) 15:58, 17 October 2013 (PDT)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox