Difference between revisions of "Team H(oo)KD Week 15 Status Report"
From LMU BioDB 2013
(Added sections) |
(→Coder Status Report: Began status report) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Coder Status Report== | ==Coder Status Report== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Determined why TallyEngine counted 917 genes in the gene database for ''C.trachomatis'' while the count was 919 when viewing the gene database in Access. | ||
| + | :*Apparently, one ordered locus ID (CTA_0406/CTA_0407/CTA_0408) is actually a combination of three ordered locus IDs each of which were predicted to correspond to a different gene before it was found that all three IDs actually correspond to the same gene. TallyEngine does not separate the ordered locus IDs while Access does. | ||
| + | :*In consulting with Dr. Dahlquist and Dr. Dionisio, we decided to leave this as is and describe the discrepancy in the final testing report, which is recorded in my [[Ksherbina Project Notebook|project journal]] under November 27-28, 2013. | ||
===Reflection=== | ===Reflection=== | ||
Revision as of 06:40, 6 December 2013
| Project Manager/Coder: Katrina Sherbina | Quality Assurance: Hilda Delgadillo | GenMAPP User: Dillon Williams |
| Project Guidelines: | Gene Database Project | Report Guidelines | |
| Team Journal Assignments | Week 12 Status Report | Week 13 Status Report | Week 15 Status Report |
| Individual Status Reports: | HDelgadi Project Notebook | dwilliams Project Notebook | Ksherbina Project Notebook |
| Useful Links: | Class Page | Team Home Page |
| Final Product | Project Deliverables |
Contents |
Coder Status Report
- Determined why TallyEngine counted 917 genes in the gene database for C.trachomatis while the count was 919 when viewing the gene database in Access.
- Apparently, one ordered locus ID (CTA_0406/CTA_0407/CTA_0408) is actually a combination of three ordered locus IDs each of which were predicted to correspond to a different gene before it was found that all three IDs actually correspond to the same gene. TallyEngine does not separate the ordered locus IDs while Access does.
- In consulting with Dr. Dahlquist and Dr. Dionisio, we decided to leave this as is and describe the discrepancy in the final testing report, which is recorded in my project journal under November 27-28, 2013.
