Difference between revisions of "Alina's Assessment and Reflection"
From LMU BioDB 2013
(→Statement of Work: testing report work) |
(→Statement of Work: report link 3) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**Compared found Gene ID formats with corresponding online resources (UniProt, RefSeq) | **Compared found Gene ID formats with corresponding online resources (UniProt, RefSeq) | ||
**Export Reports contributed to: | **Export Reports contributed to: | ||
| − | ***[[https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2013/index.php/TATK_E4:_TIGR4_Testing_Report#Compare_Gene_Database_to_Outside_Resource|E4]] [[https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2013/index.php/TATK_E3:_TIGR4_Testing_Report|E3]] | + | ***[[https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2013/index.php/TATK_E4:_TIGR4_Testing_Report#Compare_Gene_Database_to_Outside_Resource|E4]] [[https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2013/index.php/TATK_E3:_TIGR4_Testing_Report|E3]] [[https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2013/index.php/TATK_Export_One:_TIGR4_Testing_Report|E1]] |
| + | |||
* Provide references or links to artifacts of your work, such as: | * Provide references or links to artifacts of your work, such as: | ||
Revision as of 21:33, 13 December 2013
Statement of Work
- Describe exactly what you did on the project.
- Updating of Gene Database Testing Reports
- Was responsible for running counts (XMLPipeDB Match, Tally Engine, SQL)
- Performed visual inspections within gdb files
- Provided screenshots when necessary
- (Did not update GenMAPP aspects, left to Kevin)
- Compared found Gene ID formats with corresponding online resources (UniProt, RefSeq)
- Export Reports contributed to:
- Provide references or links to artifacts of your work, such as:
- Wiki pages
- Other files or documents
- Code or scripts
Assessment of Project
- Give an objective assessment of the success of your project workflow and teamwork.
- What worked and what didn't work?
- What would you do differently if you could do it all over again?
- Evaluate the Gene Database Project and Group Report in the following areas:
- Content: What is the quality of the work?
- Organization: Comment on the organization of the project and of your group's wiki pages.
- Completeness: Did your team achieve all of the project objectives? Why or why not?
Reflection on the Process
- What did you learn?
- With your head (biological or computer science principles)
- With your heart (personal qualities and teamwork qualities that make things work or not work)?
- With your hands (technical skills)?
- What lesson will you take away from this project that you will still use a year from now?
