Difference between revisions of "Miles Malefyt deliverables"

From LMU BioDB 2013
Jump to: navigation, search
(Statement of work)
(week 15)
Line 35: Line 35:
 
*ran the first integration of the data and came up with 5535 errors which is roughly half of the overall genes we loaded.
 
*ran the first integration of the data and came up with 5535 errors which is roughly half of the overall genes we loaded.
 
*loaded genMAPP and Mappfinder results
 
*loaded genMAPP and Mappfinder results
 +
 +
[[Media:MAPPFinder_results_T15-Criterion_Increased-GO.txt|Increased expression at T15]]
 +
[[Media:MAPPFinder_results_T15-Criterion_Decreased-GO.txt|Decreased expression at T15]]
 +
[[Media:MAPPFinder_t60-Criterion_Increased-GO.txt|Increased expression at t60]]
 +
[[Media:MAPPFinder_t60-Criterion_Decreasaed-GO.txt|Decreased expression at t60]]
 
*analyzed the Gene Ontology report
 
*analyzed the Gene Ontology report
 
**found a specific metabolic pathway that was pertinent to the treatment of NaCl
 
**found a specific metabolic pathway that was pertinent to the treatment of NaCl

Revision as of 23:05, 13 December 2013

Contents

Statement of work

Week 12

  • Read the paper on the salinity and sucrose stress on gene expression
  • Sorted the raw data into an XML file
  • started to compile the raw data
    • downloaded all raw data and sorted through the information needed
    • used the cys5 and cys3 fold change as well as all the IDs
  • Uploaded 300 NaCl compiled data set

Week 13

  • I continued to sort the raw data and began to process the data in an xls file
  • this was a very repetitive part because it involved a lot of replications for each time set
  • finished my compiled raw data and processed raw data, as well as the data ready for GenMAPP
  • Made individual LOG fold change ratios for each time point replicate then averaged all of the LOG fold change ratios for each of the time points
  • preformed a Tstat test
  • Preformed a Pvalue test
  • added a row of N next to the gene ID name in the forGenMAPP tab
  • uploaded Processed Data
    • NOTE:the GenMAPP version of the tab is labeled Complete Processed data_MPM and not forGenMAPP

week 15

  • I worked on some of the mistakes that I had made in my prior data sets
    • removed AVG_LOGFC_ALL row
    • added individual Pvalues and TSTAT for each individual replicate of the experiment instead of one Tstat and P value for the whole experiment
  • sanity check concluded the number of genes significantly changed at each time point
    • T15- 5520
    • T30- 7484
    • T60- 6711
    • T240- 5901
  • Removed all of the #DIV/0! from the data that was transferred over to the GenMapp data
  • uploaded XLS Version and TXT version, USE THIS
  • had to change names of the columns in order to correctly upload to GenMAPP
    • system code column was renamed
    • Gene ID column was renamed to ID on the Programmers computer to resolve some issues
  • it appears that there is something wrong with the actual gene IDs that is not compatible with GenMAPP
  • ran the first integration of the data and came up with 5535 errors which is roughly half of the overall genes we loaded.
  • loaded genMAPP and Mappfinder results

Increased expression at T15 Decreased expression at T15 Increased expression at t60 Decreased expression at t60

  • analyzed the Gene Ontology report
    • found a specific metabolic pathway that was pertinent to the treatment of NaCl
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox