Difference between revisions of "Alina's Assessment and Reflection"

From LMU BioDB 2013
Jump to: navigation, search
(XML/Exception File Comparison: excel info format)
(XML/Exception File Comparison)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
===XML/Exception File Comparison===
 
===XML/Exception File Comparison===
 
*Used XMLPipeDB Match in order to search Uniprot XML file for species IDs with format SP_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] and got 2126 results.
 
*Used XMLPipeDB Match in order to search Uniprot XML file for species IDs with format SP_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] and got 2126 results.
first search in xmlmatch:
 
 
*This was saved as a text file in order to make compatible for Excel. This file and exceptions file were put in adjacent columns and Excel match function was used. All results found to be #N/A.
 
*This was saved as a text file in order to make compatible for Excel. This file and exceptions file were put in adjacent columns and Excel match function was used. All results found to be #N/A.
 
*'''Excel File:''' [[Media:20131203_IDExcelcomparison_tATK_TIGR4_AJV.xls|ID Comparison]]
 
*'''Excel File:''' [[Media:20131203_IDExcelcomparison_tATK_TIGR4_AJV.xls|ID Comparison]]

Revision as of 21:59, 13 December 2013

Contents

Statement of Work

  • Describe exactly what you did on the project.

Updating of Gene Database Testing Reports

  • Was responsible for running counts (XMLPipeDB Match, Tally Engine, SQL)
  • Performed visual inspections within gdb files
  • Provided screenshots when necessary
  • (Did not update GenMAPP aspects, left to Kevin)
  • Compared found Gene ID formats with corresponding online resources (UniProt, RefSeq)
  • Export Reports contributed to:

XML/Exception File Comparison

  • Used XMLPipeDB Match in order to search Uniprot XML file for species IDs with format SP_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] and got 2126 results.
  • This was saved as a text file in order to make compatible for Excel. This file and exceptions file were put in adjacent columns and Excel match function was used. All results found to be #N/A.
  • Excel File: ID Comparison


  • Provide references or links to artifacts of your work, such as:
    • Wiki pages
    • Other files or documents
    • Code or scripts

Assessment of Project

  • Give an objective assessment of the success of your project workflow and teamwork.
  • What worked and what didn't work?
  • What would you do differently if you could do it all over again?
  • Evaluate the Gene Database Project and Group Report in the following areas:
    1. Content: What is the quality of the work?
    2. Organization: Comment on the organization of the project and of your group's wiki pages.
    3. Completeness: Did your team achieve all of the project objectives? Why or why not?

Reflection on the Process

  • What did you learn?
    • With your head (biological or computer science principles)
    • With your heart (personal qualities and teamwork qualities that make things work or not work)?
    • With your hands (technical skills)?
  • What lesson will you take away from this project that you will still use a year from now?
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox