Difference between revisions of "Alina's Assessment and Reflection"
From LMU BioDB 2013
(→XML/Exception File Comparison) |
(→XML/Exception File Comparison) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*Used XMLPipeDB Match in order to search Uniprot XML file for species IDs with format SP_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] and got 2126 results. | *Used XMLPipeDB Match in order to search Uniprot XML file for species IDs with format SP_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] and got 2126 results. | ||
*This was saved as a text file in order to make compatible for Excel. This file and exceptions file were put in adjacent columns and Excel match function was used. All results found to be #N/A. | *This was saved as a text file in order to make compatible for Excel. This file and exceptions file were put in adjacent columns and Excel match function was used. All results found to be #N/A. | ||
| − | * | + | *''Excel File:'' [[Media:20131203_IDExcelcomparison_tATK_TIGR4_AJV.xls|ID Comparison]] |
Revision as of 21:59, 13 December 2013
Contents |
Statement of Work
- Describe exactly what you did on the project.
Updating of Gene Database Testing Reports
- Was responsible for running counts (XMLPipeDB Match, Tally Engine, SQL)
- Performed visual inspections within gdb files
- Provided screenshots when necessary
- (Did not update GenMAPP aspects, left to Kevin)
- Compared found Gene ID formats with corresponding online resources (UniProt, RefSeq)
- Export Reports contributed to:
XML/Exception File Comparison
- Used XMLPipeDB Match in order to search Uniprot XML file for species IDs with format SP_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] and got 2126 results.
- This was saved as a text file in order to make compatible for Excel. This file and exceptions file were put in adjacent columns and Excel match function was used. All results found to be #N/A.
- Excel File: ID Comparison
- Provide references or links to artifacts of your work, such as:
- Wiki pages
- Other files or documents
- Code or scripts
Assessment of Project
- Give an objective assessment of the success of your project workflow and teamwork.
- What worked and what didn't work?
- What would you do differently if you could do it all over again?
- Evaluate the Gene Database Project and Group Report in the following areas:
- Content: What is the quality of the work?
- Organization: Comment on the organization of the project and of your group's wiki pages.
- Completeness: Did your team achieve all of the project objectives? Why or why not?
Reflection on the Process
- What did you learn?
- With your head (biological or computer science principles)
- With your heart (personal qualities and teamwork qualities that make things work or not work)?
- With your hands (technical skills)?
- What lesson will you take away from this project that you will still use a year from now?
