User talk:Gleis
Contents |
Week 1 Feedback
Great coverage of the checklist! If you haven’t done independent research, still say so explicitly, just so we know you haven’t forgotten. Experimentation with "raw" HTML is noted—your mixing and matching of raw HTML with wiki markup is noted.
Items for completion/follow-up:
- Independent research
- Change summaries—try to enter these more consistently.
- Link to an assignment (Week n) page
- Link to the shared journal from your user page (you have almost a link there, but not a fully accurate one)
—Dondi (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2013 (PDT)
I have answered your question on my user talk page. — Kdahlquist (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2013 (PDT)
Week 1 Follow-Up Feedback
Thank you for catching up on the missing information/wiki skills from last week! You haven’t yet gotten totally consistent with entering a change summary whenever you edit a wiki page, so try to keep that in mind as you log more hours with the wiki.
—Dondi (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2013 (PDT)
Week 2 Feedback
- Thank you for submitting your assignment on time!
- Your translations were correct, but you needed to continue translating beyond the stop codons.
- The +3 frame was not an open reading frame.
- You have the opportunity to earn back the points you missed by making the corrections requested on the Week 3 Assignment page. The corrections are due by midnight on Friday, September 20 (thursday night/friday morning).
- The Nirenberg article was written for other practicing biochemists and was also written as a memoir, so it is understandable that it was difficult to read.
— Kdahlquist (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2013 (PDT)
Week 3 Feedback
- Thank you for submitting your assignment on time!
- Your experience with “Where’s my stuff” typically occurs when a computing system is strongly protecting file extensions like .txt and .html. Different operating systems apply protections differently. Typically, there is a setting one can hit that tells the computer that you know what you are doing with respect to these extensions, after which you will then have greater control over these. In any case, nothing to worry about; what matters is that you got a sense for what role these file extensions play.
- Your sed and match skills are great! All of your commands were correct.
- You were missing a number of requested links and wiki elements:
- Your user page was missing a link to the Week 3 assignment page
- Your journal answer page was missing a link back to your user page
- Your journal answer page was also missing the requested Journal Entry category
- Please note the bulleted checklist provided under the assignment headings so that you don’t miss these in future assignments. A template will help, so that you will only need to edit these links in one place. Let me know if you need additional help with getting a template to work as needed.
—Dondi (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2013 (PDT)
Week 4 Feedback
Thank you for submitting your work on time! Here’s how your “automated annotation” work turned out, item by item. Items that had issues are italicized:
- -35 box was correctly identified with an appropriate command.
- -10 box was correctly identified with an appropriate command.
- Transcription start site was correctly identified but the command you used does not reflect the consensus information—you based your sed directive on the ribosome binding site and not the -10 box.
- Ribosome binding site was correctly identified with an appropriate command.
- Start codon was correctly identified with an appropriate command.
- Stop codon does not correctly count off in triplets after the start codon.
- Terminator did not correctly include the full hairpin.
- You correctly stated the mRNA strand, although you had to do some manual editing from your command.
- The amino acid sequence was not correctly identified due to the issue with locating the stop codon.
In terms of your wiki link routine, everything was there—keep it up!
Let me know if you have any questions.
