User talk:Eyanosch - Revision history

Kdahlquist: feedback on Kristen's page

2015-11-24T19:26:35Z

feedback on Kristen's page

Dondi: Provide initial Week 6 feedback.

2015-10-25T23:44:07Z

Provide initial Week 6 feedback.

Dondi: Provide Week 4 feedback.

2015-10-05T06:36:27Z

Provide Week 4 feedback.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 24 November 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 12 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* I put feedback on your compiled raw data and the next steps on [[User_talk:Kzebrows#Week_12_Feedback \| Kristen's User Talk page.]]
		+
		+	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 11:26, 24 November 2015 (PST)''
		+
	== Week 6 Feedback ==		== Week 6 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 25 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 6 Feedback ==
		+
		+	I’ve chosen to issue partial feedback sooner than complete feedback later, in case it will help you address issues with [[Week 8]].
		+
		+	=== Best Practices ===
		+
		+	* Individual and shared work were both submitted on time.
		+	* Requisite links to and from the user page as well as page categories are all present.
		+	* Electronic notebook was maintained.
		+	* Work was submitted in appropriate frequencies with corresponding summaries.
		+	* ''This amounts to a “best practices” perfect score. Good work, keep it up!''
		+
		+	=== Database Exercises ===
		+
		+	Work in progress.
		+
		+	—''[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 16:44, 25 October 2015 (PDT)''
		+
	== Week 4 Feedback ==		== Week 4 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 5 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 4 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* Work was submitted on time, with 22 minutes to spare.
		+	* All good-habit items are largely fulfilled:
		+	** All expected links and categories were noted—you should consider adding your user page link to your template so that you don’t have to add it to every single journal entry.
		+	** Electronic notebook content was seen.
		+	** Summaries were provided for all except 2 of the submitted edits; the overall number of edits itself showed a good pace.
		+	* For the exercises, the following issues were seen; all others were correct:
		+	** You included <code>grep</code> commands in your answers—these are not necessary because they don’t actually change the text and in fact possibly harmful if they incorrectly filter a line of text.
		+	** The incorrect start codon was chosen—the one found appears ''before'' the ribosome binding site, which is biologically incorrect.
		+	** The incorrect stop codon was chosen—the answer missed the proper separation of the sequence into codons.
		+	** Your electronic notebook saved your terminator answer: it had the right command embedded within but your final sequence had a typo.
		+	** The mRNA sequence was incorrect—it should include the promoter and terminator too, and all of the nucleotides in between.
		+	* Shared responses were provided and they came in on time.
		+
		+	—''[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 23:36, 4 October 2015 (PDT)''
		+
	== Week 3 Feedback ==		== Week 3 Feedback ==