User talk:Malverso - Revision history

Dondi: Provide initial Week 6 feedback.

2015-10-25T23:34:42Z

Provide initial Week 6 feedback.

Dondi: Provide Week 4 feedback.

2015-10-07T19:57:09Z

Provide Week 4 feedback.

Dondi: Note found link to user page.

2015-10-04T07:18:23Z

Note found link to user page.

Dondi: Provide Week 3 feedback.

2015-09-25T06:46:58Z

Provide Week 3 feedback.

Kdahlquist: gave week 2 feedback

2015-09-21T06:18:31Z

gave week 2 feedback

Kdahlquist: notification of answered question

2015-09-11T06:10:49Z

notification of answered question

Dondi: Add signature.

2015-09-10T07:37:08Z

Add signature.

Dondi: Supply week 1 feedback.

2015-09-09T06:23:49Z

Supply week 1 feedback.

New page

== Week 1 Feedback ==

* I answered your question on my [[User_talk:Dondi | User talk page]].
* The scores have not been posted yet, but I wanted to give you feedback on your [[Week 1]] Assignment.
* You did everything on time—with many hours to spare, in fact. Good job, keep it up!
* Your assignment is complete except for one small detail: you only used 2 heading levels and not 3. Based on your overall work I don’t think it’s a question of whether you can do it; but overall it is a good habit to treat homework instructions like specs to fulfill. Everything else came in great, and you never forgot to summarize each of your wiki changes! (though you did repeat some messages, I think those were understandable)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 25 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 6 Feedback ==
		+
		+	I’ve chosen to issue partial feedback sooner than complete feedback later, in case it will help you address issues with [[Week 8]].
		+
		+	=== Best Practices ===
		+
		+	* Individual and shared work were both submitted on time.
		+	* Requisite links to and from the user page as well as page categories are all present.
		+	* Electronic notebook was maintained.
		+	* Work was submitted in appropriate frequencies with corresponding summaries.
		+	* ''This amounts to a “best practices” perfect score. Good work, keep it up!''
		+
		+	=== Database Exercises ===
		+
		+	Work in progress.
		+
		+	—''[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 16:34, 25 October 2015 (PDT)''
		+
	== Week 4 Feedback ==		== Week 4 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 7 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 4 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* Work was submitted on time, with a small fix applied the next day (and noted in your journal).
		+	* All good-habit items are fulfilled:
		+	** All expected links and categories were noted.
		+	** Electronic notebook content was seen.
		+	** Summaries were consistently provided over a good number of edits.
		+	* For the exercises, all answers were correct—good job! The spacing fix made it ''completely'' correct, but that is a formatting improvement rather than a content-based one.
		+	* Shared responses were provided and they came in on time.
		+
		+	—''[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 12:57, 7 October 2015 (PDT)''
		+
	== Week 3 Erratum ==		== Week 3 Erratum ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 4 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 3 Erratum ==
		+
		+	I just realized that you ''do'' have a link back to your user page in your template—it’s the week 1 journal entry, derp. I did not catch it before due to the naming, and now that you have renamed it I realize what it is now. The link was already present (though too-subtly named) back in week 3, so I take back the feedback that you did not have a link to your user page. In the end this did not affect your final score, but I just wanted to let you know that I caught that anyway.
		+
		+	—''[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 00:18, 4 October 2015 (PDT)''
		+
	== Week 3 Feedback ==		== Week 3 Feedback ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Week 2 Feedback ==
@@ Line 11: / Line 23: @@
 ''&mdash; [[User:Kdahlquist|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist|talk]]) 23:18, 20 September 2015 (PDT)''
-= Week 1 Feedback ==
+== Week 1 Feedback ==
 * I answered your question on my [[User_talk:Dondi | User talk page]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:18, 21 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	== Week 1 Feedback ==	+	== Week 2 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* Although, the [[Week 2]] scores have not yet been posted, I want to give you feedback on the assignment that you can incorporate to your your [[Week 3]] submission.
		+	* First, thank you for submitting your assignment on time.
		+	* Your translations of the +1, +2, and +3 reading frames are correct, but your translations of the -1, -2, and -3 frames are not. I suspect that you did not translate 5' to 3' but translated left to right which would have been 3' to 5' on the bottom strand. You will want to make sure you are clear on this as you are heading into the Week 3 assignment. Double check with your partner that you have the orientation correct.
		+	* You did not include anything by the way of an electronic notebook for this assignment. Although this assignment was pretty straightforward, you still need to document the process of what you did to arrive at the answers, not just supply the answers. Please be sure to do this for your Week 3 submission.
		+	* You wrote something in the Summary field for 5/5 contributions between the Week 1 and Week 2 deadlines, keep up the good work! However, you completed the full assignment in only 3 edits to the wiki. This suggests that you are doing the work outside the wiki and then pasting it in. Ideally, you should do the work natively in the wiki environment. Even if this is not the case, you will want to consider saving your changes more frequently so that the granularity of the changes is smaller.
		+	* You have set up your template and completed all the links requested.
		+	* With regards to your comments on your shared journal entry, I knew that the Nirenberg article would be difficult for folks without a biology background and even for folks with with a biology background. However, I also think it's a good exercise to go back to the original source sometimes and read about discoveries from "the horse's mouth" so to speak. I'm glad to hear that you are revisiting the text book to assist you with understanding.
		+
		+	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 23:18, 20 September 2015 (PDT)''
		+
		+	= Week 1 Feedback ==

	* I answered your question on my [[User_talk:Dondi \| User talk page]].		* I answered your question on my [[User_talk:Dondi \| User talk page]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 11 September 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:

	''—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 00:37, 10 September 2015 (PDT)''		''—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 00:37, 10 September 2015 (PDT)''
		+
		+	I also answered your question on my [[User_talk:Kdahlquist \| user talk page.]] ''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 23:10, 10 September 2015 (PDT)''

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:37, 10 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* You did everything on time—with many hours to spare, in fact. Good job, keep it up!		* You did everything on time—with many hours to spare, in fact. Good job, keep it up!
	* Your assignment is complete except for one small detail: you only used 2 heading levels and not 3. Based on your overall work I don’t think it’s a question of whether you can do it; but overall it is a good habit to treat homework instructions like specs to fulfill. Everything else came in great, and you never forgot to summarize each of your wiki changes! (though you did repeat some messages, I think those were understandable)		* Your assignment is complete except for one small detail: you only used 2 heading levels and not 3. Based on your overall work I don’t think it’s a question of whether you can do it; but overall it is a good habit to treat homework instructions like specs to fulfill. Everything else came in great, and you never forgot to summarize each of your wiki changes! (though you did repeat some messages, I think those were understandable)
		+
		+	''—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 00:37, 10 September 2015 (PDT)''