#* Maybe this isn't actually an example of something not working, but our calculated fold changes were quite different (much lower in magnitude) from those reported in Van Acker et al's paper. However, they had the same directions and generally saw the same relative trends (ie the relatively higher fold changes in the paper were among the higher in our data). Also, very few of the genes they considered significant (with their super-lenient criteria that results in 30% of the genes seeing significant changes) were significant by our criteria. | #* Maybe this isn't actually an example of something not working, but our calculated fold changes were quite different (much lower in magnitude) from those reported in Van Acker et al's paper. However, they had the same directions and generally saw the same relative trends (ie the relatively higher fold changes in the paper were among the higher in our data). Also, very few of the genes they considered significant (with their super-lenient criteria that results in 30% of the genes seeing significant changes) were significant by our criteria. |