Compare your list with your partner who used a different version of the Gene Database. Are your terms the same or different? Why do you think that is?

Compare your list with your partner who used a different version of the Gene Database. Are your terms the same or different? Why do you think that is?

*The terms are different.  Like before, I would say that either the exact strings associated with the gene ontologies have changed, or my database is more updated.

*Due to a miscommunication Mahrad did 2009 increase so for this one problem I compared to Lena's data.  The terms are different.  Like before, I would say that either the exact strings associated with the gene ontologies have changed, or my database is more updated.

*List the GO terms associated with each of those genes in your individual journal. (Note: they might not all be found.) Are they the same as your partner who is using a different Gene Database? Why or why not?

*List the GO terms associated with each of those genes in your individual journal. (Note: they might not all be found.) Are they the same as your partner who is using a different Gene Database? Why or why not?

I made a copy of the criterion file and opened it up in excel, which put the data in MAPPFinder in tabular excel form.

I made a copy of the criterion file and opened it up in excel, which put the data in MAPPFinder in tabular excel form.

There are rows of information that give the background information on how MAPPFinder made the calculations. I compared this information with my partner who used a different version of the Vibrio Gene Database.  

There are rows of information that give the background information on how MAPPFinder made the calculations. I compared this information with Lena's who used a different version of the Vibrio Gene Database.  

*Which numbers are different? Why are they different?

*Which numbers are different? Why are they different?

**Numbers different: 565 probes meeting the filter linked to a UniProt ID., 330 genes meeting the criterion linked to a GO term., 5100 Probes linked to a UniProt ID., 2475 Genes linked to a GO term.,The z score is based on an N of 2475 and a R of 330 distinct genes in the GO.  These were the rows that were different.  Based on this I would say that the database I am using has more genes and is the more updated version of the database.

**Numbers different: 565 probes meeting the filter linked to a UniProt ID., 330 genes meeting the criterion linked to a GO term., 5100 Probes linked to a UniProt ID., 2475 Genes linked to a GO term.,The z score is based on an N of 2475 and a R of 330 distinct genes in the GO.  These were the rows that were different.  Based on this I would say that the database I am using has more genes and is the more updated version of the database.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Write a paragraph that briefly summarizes and gives a scientific conclusion for the work that you did for part 1 and 2 this week.

Write a paragraph that briefly summarizes and gives a scientific conclusion for the work that you did for part 1 and 2 this week.