Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lenaolufson"

From LMU BioDB 2015
Jump to: navigation, search
(notification of answered question)
(added week 2 feedback)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
I have also answered your question on my [[User_talk:Kdahlquist | user talk page.]]  ''— [[User:Kdahlquist|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist|talk]]) 23:18, 10 September 2015 (PDT)''
 
I have also answered your question on my [[User_talk:Kdahlquist | user talk page.]]  ''— [[User:Kdahlquist|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist|talk]]) 23:18, 10 September 2015 (PDT)''
 +
 +
== Week 2 Feedback ==
 +
 +
* Although, the [[Week 2]] scores have not yet been posted, I want to give you feedback on the assignment that you can incorporate to your your [[Week 3]] submission.
 +
* First, thank you for submitting your assignment on time.
 +
* Your translations are correct; although it would have been better for completeness to go ahead and translate the rest of the sequence after the stop codon, in this case.
 +
* You did not include anything by the way of an electronic notebook for this assignment.  Although this assignment was pretty straightforward, you still need to document the process of what you did to arrive at the answers, not just supply the answers.  Please be sure to do this for your Week 3 submission.
 +
* You wrote something in the Summary field for 7/14 contributions between the Week 1 and Week 2 deadlines.  We are aiming to do this 100% of the time, so this needs a little work.  Also, you completed the full assignment in only 3 edits to the wiki.  You will want to consider saving your changes more frequently so that the granularity of the changes is smaller.
 +
* For each week's assignment, you will need to create links from your User page to that week's assignment and to your individual and shared journal entries, as well as a link back from your individual journal entry and to the category "Journal Entry". 
 +
** You have actually created all of these links on your template page (by borrowing the formatting from a fellow student, I see).  However, what is missing is that you need to actually '''''invoke''''' the template on your user page and individual journal entry pages.
 +
*** To do so, you need to use the syntax <nowiki>{{Lenaolufson}}</nowiki>, with the curly brackets, on your user page and on your [[Lenaolufson Week 2]] page.
 +
*** You could even invoke your template on all of your future individual journal assignment pages now, so you would never forget to do it again and would also avoid losing points for not providing the links.
 +
* If you begin a line with a single space character, the text will appear in a fixed-width font, which is better for representing nucleic acid and protein sequences because they will then line up with each other better.
 +
* With regards to your comments on your shared journal entry, you will see from the other students' comments, that others had issues with the Kaji and Kaji paper.  It is sometimes the shortest papers that are the most difficult to understand!
 +
 +
''&mdash; [[User:Kdahlquist|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist|talk]]) 23:32, 18 September 2015 (PDT)''

Revision as of 06:32, 19 September 2015

Elena Olufson


Template:Lenaolufson

Week 1 Feedback

  • I answered your question on my User talk page.
  • The scores have not been posted yet, but I wanted to give you feedback on your Week 1 Assignment.
  • Except for the email to Dr. Dahlquist and me, your assignment was submitted on time overall. Many of our assignments will be multipart like this one, so getting into a checklist habit will help you cover all the bases.
  • Speaking of a checklist approach, your assignment is complete except for the items that I list below. I particularly like how you took advantage of external links in your work history and other areas of your page. You wrote something in the Summary field most of the time, although some were just generic indications of what sections got changed. See if you can get more descriptive as you get the hang of this; you’ll find that it makes your work more deliberate.
  • Missing items:
    1. You did not indicate a snail mail address; withholding it on purpose is fine (say, for privacy reasons due to an off-campus address), but just as with the email to Dr. Dahlquist and me, we would have preferred an indication to that effect, to differentiate between forgetting to do it vs. not forgetting but preferring not to supply it.
    2. You defined headings down to just one level. Try to do multiple levels, at least 3 when appropriate, so that you can see how the headings give your page an outline structure.
    3. You created numbered lists as instructed, although in the Personal Interests section, with those single-item lists, a bulleted format would have been more appropriate. Even though you are checking off subtasks in this assignment, ideally you are also performing them in a context that matches their purpose well.
    4. Similarly, you did technically create and use a template, but said template does not really hold content that benefits from template automation. Ideally, your template contains something that will genuinely save you a lot of retyping in the future. The example that we mentioned in class was a template holding a quick-reference list for all of your pages—that will be very useful as a template because you will want to include that in every page you create, and will be a pain to retype every time. So, consider those practical elements when choosing to practice the basic wiki skills. That way it isn’t just a rote exercise and is actually something is useful for the rest of the semester.
  • You will have the opportunity to make up some of the points you missed by completing the tasks listed above by the Week 2 deadline, midnight on September 15.

Dondi (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2015 (PDT)

I have also answered your question on my user talk page. Kdahlquist (talk) 23:18, 10 September 2015 (PDT)

Week 2 Feedback

  • Although, the Week 2 scores have not yet been posted, I want to give you feedback on the assignment that you can incorporate to your your Week 3 submission.
  • First, thank you for submitting your assignment on time.
  • Your translations are correct; although it would have been better for completeness to go ahead and translate the rest of the sequence after the stop codon, in this case.
  • You did not include anything by the way of an electronic notebook for this assignment. Although this assignment was pretty straightforward, you still need to document the process of what you did to arrive at the answers, not just supply the answers. Please be sure to do this for your Week 3 submission.
  • You wrote something in the Summary field for 7/14 contributions between the Week 1 and Week 2 deadlines. We are aiming to do this 100% of the time, so this needs a little work. Also, you completed the full assignment in only 3 edits to the wiki. You will want to consider saving your changes more frequently so that the granularity of the changes is smaller.
  • For each week's assignment, you will need to create links from your User page to that week's assignment and to your individual and shared journal entries, as well as a link back from your individual journal entry and to the category "Journal Entry".
    • You have actually created all of these links on your template page (by borrowing the formatting from a fellow student, I see). However, what is missing is that you need to actually invoke the template on your user page and individual journal entry pages.
      • To do so, you need to use the syntax {{Lenaolufson}}, with the curly brackets, on your user page and on your Lenaolufson Week 2 page.
      • You could even invoke your template on all of your future individual journal assignment pages now, so you would never forget to do it again and would also avoid losing points for not providing the links.
  • If you begin a line with a single space character, the text will appear in a fixed-width font, which is better for representing nucleic acid and protein sequences because they will then line up with each other better.
  • With regards to your comments on your shared journal entry, you will see from the other students' comments, that others had issues with the Kaji and Kaji paper. It is sometimes the shortest papers that are the most difficult to understand!

Kdahlquist (talk) 23:32, 18 September 2015 (PDT)