Difference between revisions of "Class Journal Week 8"
From LMU BioDB 2015
(create page, aww yeah) |
(Added questions for Jake) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:Nanguiano|Nanguiano]] ([[User talk:Nanguiano|talk]]) 15:06, 20 October 2015 (PDT) | [[User:Nanguiano|Nanguiano]] ([[User talk:Nanguiano|talk]]) 15:06, 20 October 2015 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Jake Woodlee == | ||
| + | #What were the main issues with the data and analysis identified by Baggerly and Coombs? What best practices enumerated by DataONE were violated? Which of these did Dr. Baggerly claim were common issues? | ||
| + | #* | ||
| + | #What recommendations does Dr. Baggerly recommend for reproducible research? How do these correspond to what DataONE recommends? | ||
| + | #* | ||
| + | #Do you have any further reaction to this case after viewing Dr. Baggerly's talk? | ||
| + | #* | ||
| + | #Go back to the Merrell et al. (2002) paper and look at your "sanity check" where you compared the fold changes and p values for certain genes between your work and the paper. Did the values match? Why do you think that is? Do you think there is sufficient information there for you to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not? | ||
| + | #* | ||
| + | [[User:Jwoodlee|Jwoodlee]] ([[User talk:Jwoodlee|talk]]) 15:35, 22 October 2015 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:35, 22 October 2015
Nicole Anguiano
- What were the main issues with the data and analysis identified by Baggerly and Coombs? What best practices enumerated by DataONE were violated? Which of these did Dr. Baggerly claim were common issues?
- What recommendations does Dr. Baggerly recommend for reproducible research? How do these correspond to what DataONE recommends?
- Do you have any further reaction to this case after viewing Dr. Baggerly's talk?
- Go back to the Merrell et al. (2002) paper and look at your "sanity check" where you compared the fold changes and p values for certain genes between your work and the paper. Did the values match? Why do you think that is? Do you think there is sufficient information there for you to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not?
Nanguiano (talk) 15:06, 20 October 2015 (PDT)
Jake Woodlee
- What were the main issues with the data and analysis identified by Baggerly and Coombs? What best practices enumerated by DataONE were violated? Which of these did Dr. Baggerly claim were common issues?
- What recommendations does Dr. Baggerly recommend for reproducible research? How do these correspond to what DataONE recommends?
- Do you have any further reaction to this case after viewing Dr. Baggerly's talk?
- Go back to the Merrell et al. (2002) paper and look at your "sanity check" where you compared the fold changes and p values for certain genes between your work and the paper. Did the values match? Why do you think that is? Do you think there is sufficient information there for you to reproduce their data analysis? Why or why not?
