*It seems apparent that there exist some entries in the 'ORDEREDLOCUSNAMES' that are not accounted for by the MATCH utility ('''VC_A0360.1'''); it is also clear that there are two entries acting as one entry within the postgreSQL output ('''VC_1738/VC_1739'''). '''VC_A0360.1''' also exists within the postgreSQL output. | *It seems apparent that there exist some entries in the 'ORDEREDLOCUSNAMES' that are not accounted for by the MATCH utility ('''VC_A0360.1'''); it is also clear that there are two entries acting as one entry within the postgreSQL output ('''VC_1738/VC_1739'''). '''VC_A0360.1''' also exists within the postgreSQL output. |