Class Journal Week 6 - Revision history

ArashLari: /* Zachary Van Ysseldyk's Responses */

2017-10-15T02:24:12Z

‎Zachary Van Ysseldyk's Responses

Dbashour: added signature and template

2017-10-10T06:56:38Z

added signature and template

Dbashour: added question 4

2017-10-10T06:56:08Z

added question 4

Dbashour: added question 3

2017-10-10T06:55:41Z

added question 3

Dbashour: added number 2

2017-10-10T06:55:19Z

added number 2

Dbashour: added question 1

2017-10-10T06:54:52Z

added question 1

Aporras1: /* Aporras1's Responses */ fixed typo

2017-10-10T06:07:33Z

‎Aporras1's Responses: fixed typo

Simonwro120: Journal responses

2017-10-10T05:56:58Z

Journal responses

Hhinsch: fixed a typo in my answer

2017-10-10T05:47:22Z

fixed a typo in my answer

Hhinsch: added my answers to the class discussion thread

2017-10-10T05:46:17Z

added my answers to the class discussion thread

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 15 October 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	{{Template:Zvanysse}}		{{Template:Zvanysse}}

		+	== Arash Lari's Responses ==
		+	#I had never heard about this case prior to this video.
		+	#I was surprised that there weren't objective measures in place to verify the data at such a prestigious university. Especially for something so big and groundbreaking, you would expect a lot of scrutiny to make sure they don't run into a PR disaster like they did.
		+	#It wasn't until unbiased third parties were able to review the data that the phubbed data was discovered.
		+	#How on earth did he successfully convince anyone to hire him ever again?
		+	[[User:ArashLari\|ArashLari]] ([[User talk:ArashLari\|talk]]) 19:24, 14 October 2017 (PDT)
		+	{{Template:ArashLari}}

	==QLanners Responses==		==QLanners Responses==

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 10 October 2017
Line 131:		Line 131:
	# Data sharing was the main reason that Potti's fraud was discovered. It was that shared data that led to the discovery of the manipulated data that Potti had done.		# Data sharing was the main reason that Potti's fraud was discovered. It was that shared data that led to the discovery of the manipulated data that Potti had done.
	#I would like to know if Dr. Nevans actually was unaware of the fraud Dr. Potti had committed. I ask this because Dr. Nevans was Potti's mentor so Dr. Nevans must have been aware of the work he was doing and the data he was collecting. Dr. Nevans mentions that he wanted to believe the data was correct for the sake of the cancer community and the potential that it had, which makes me skeptical.		#I would like to know if Dr. Nevans actually was unaware of the fraud Dr. Potti had committed. I ask this because Dr. Nevans was Potti's mentor so Dr. Nevans must have been aware of the work he was doing and the data he was collecting. Dr. Nevans mentions that he wanted to believe the data was correct for the sake of the cancer community and the potential that it had, which makes me skeptical.
		+	[[User:Dbashour\|Dbashour]] ([[User talk:Dbashour\|talk]]) 23:56, 9 October 2017 (PDT)
		+
		+	{{template:Dbashour}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 10 October 2017
Line 130:		Line 130:
	# I was disappointed that Potti turned to manipulating the data just to publish his work and that he would potentially be giving the patients the wrong medication that would be doing the opposite of what they saw him for. That saddens me because the man and his wife really believed that his treatment would work and developed such hope for recovery.		# I was disappointed that Potti turned to manipulating the data just to publish his work and that he would potentially be giving the patients the wrong medication that would be doing the opposite of what they saw him for. That saddens me because the man and his wife really believed that his treatment would work and developed such hope for recovery.
	# Data sharing was the main reason that Potti's fraud was discovered. It was that shared data that led to the discovery of the manipulated data that Potti had done.		# Data sharing was the main reason that Potti's fraud was discovered. It was that shared data that led to the discovery of the manipulated data that Potti had done.
		+	#I would like to know if Dr. Nevans actually was unaware of the fraud Dr. Potti had committed. I ask this because Dr. Nevans was Potti's mentor so Dr. Nevans must have been aware of the work he was doing and the data he was collecting. Dr. Nevans mentions that he wanted to believe the data was correct for the sake of the cancer community and the potential that it had, which makes me skeptical.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 10 October 2017
Line 129:		Line 129:
	#No, I was unaware of this case of fraud before viewing the video.		#No, I was unaware of this case of fraud before viewing the video.
	# I was disappointed that Potti turned to manipulating the data just to publish his work and that he would potentially be giving the patients the wrong medication that would be doing the opposite of what they saw him for. That saddens me because the man and his wife really believed that his treatment would work and developed such hope for recovery.		# I was disappointed that Potti turned to manipulating the data just to publish his work and that he would potentially be giving the patients the wrong medication that would be doing the opposite of what they saw him for. That saddens me because the man and his wife really believed that his treatment would work and developed such hope for recovery.
		+	# Data sharing was the main reason that Potti's fraud was discovered. It was that shared data that led to the discovery of the manipulated data that Potti had done.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 10 October 2017
Line 128:		Line 128:
	==Dina Bashoura's Responses==		==Dina Bashoura's Responses==
	#No, I was unaware of this case of fraud before viewing the video.		#No, I was unaware of this case of fraud before viewing the video.
		+	# I was disappointed that Potti turned to manipulating the data just to publish his work and that he would potentially be giving the patients the wrong medication that would be doing the opposite of what they saw him for. That saddens me because the man and his wife really believed that his treatment would work and developed such hope for recovery.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 10 October 2017
Line 125:		Line 125:
	[[User:Simonwro120\|Simonwro120]] ([[User talk:Simonwro120\|talk]]) 22:56, 9 October 2017 (PDT)		[[User:Simonwro120\|Simonwro120]] ([[User talk:Simonwro120\|talk]]) 22:56, 9 October 2017 (PDT)
	{{simonwro120}}		{{simonwro120}}
		+
		+	==Dina Bashoura's Responses==
		+	#No, I was unaware of this case of fraud before viewing the video.

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 ==Aporras1's Responses==
-#’’’Were you aware of this case of research fraud before viewing this video?’’’ I wasn’t ever aware of this case of research fraud before watching the video.
+#Were you aware of this case of research fraud before viewing this video? I wasn’t ever aware of this case of research fraud before watching the video.
-#’’’What are your initial reactions to hearing about this case?’’’ My initial reactions were in absolute astonishment. Not only because of how someone could fabricate data sets which resulted in patients not receiving the best possible care, but also how it managed to continue after a reviewing committee.
+#What are your initial reactions to hearing about this case? My initial reactions were in absolute astonishment. Not only because of how someone could fabricate data sets which resulted in patients not receiving the best possible care, but also how it managed to continue after a reviewing committee.
-#’’’What role did data sharing play in uncovering this fraud?’’’ Data sharing allowed for other individuals to test the data sets and results. Once others could access the data, they found many errors which were alarming and were able to tell others of these errors to halt the program.
+#What role did data sharing play in uncovering this fraud? Data sharing allowed for other individuals to test the data sets and results. Once others could access the data, they found many errors which were alarming and were able to tell others of these errors to halt the program.
-#’’’What additional information would you like to know about this case? (We will be visiting it again in subsequent weeks in the course.)’’’ I was interested to find out where Dr. Potti is now and I’m amazed he is still able to do research until 2020 under supervision. Ultimately I would like to know if there have been any changes in research policy (either Duke’s or other institutions).
+#What additional information would you like to know about this case? (We will be visiting it again in subsequent weeks in the course.) I was interested to find out where Dr. Potti is now and I’m amazed he is still able to do research until 2020 under supervision. Ultimately I would like to know if there have been any changes in research policy (either Duke’s or other institutions).
 [[User:Aporras1|Aporras1]] ([[User talk:Aporras1|talk]]) 13:02, 9 October 2017 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 10 October 2017
Line 117:		Line 117:
	{{hhinsch}}		{{hhinsch}}
	[[Category:Shared]] <br>		[[Category:Shared]] <br>
		+
		+	==Simon Wroblewski's Responses==
		+	#I was not at all aware of this case research fraud before viewing the video.
		+	#I was both shocked and disappointed in Duke University's lacks of ethics and care for their community. It is an inexcusable behavior by Dr. Anil Potti to put his reputation as a scientist before the lives of his patients.
		+	#Data sharing played a key role in discovering the data manipulation that Dr. Anil Potti performed. Which ultimately led to the manipulation of his patients trust.
		+	#I'd like to know more about the organizations that reviewed his data before publication in order to understand the oversight that occurred. I'd also like to know what Dr. Potti believed he would achieve after frauding his data.
		+	[[User:Simonwro120\|Simonwro120]] ([[User talk:Simonwro120\|talk]]) 22:56, 9 October 2017 (PDT)
		+	{{simonwro120}}

@@ Line 112: / Line 112: @@
 #I did not know about this case of research fraud before the viewing of this video.
 #I was pretty dissapointed that one, this would happen at such a prestigious university and two, that it didn't surprise me that a research fraud like this would happen.
-#Data sharing played the ultimate role in uncovering this fraud. If the data was not shared, the other doctor would not have been able to find the discrepancies in the findings.
+#Data sharing played the ultimate role in uncovering this fraud. If the data was not shared, the other doctors would not have been able to find the discrepancies in the findings.
 #I would like to know about the consequences of this fraud. What has happened to Duke, and to Dr. Potti? I know he is still practicing, but why haven't his credentials been stripped? I would also like to know what consequences this has had on the area of cancer research as a whole.
 [[User:Hhinsch|Hhinsch]] ([[User talk:Hhinsch|talk]]) 22:46, 9 October 2017 (PDT)
 {{hhinsch}}
 [[Category:Shared]] <br>

@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 [[User:Emmatyrnauer|Emmatyrnauer]] ([[User talk:Emmatyrnauer|talk]]) 21:59, 9 October 2017 (PDT)
 {{Emmatyrnauer}}
+==Hayden Hinsch's Answers==
+#I did not know about this case of research fraud before the viewing of this video.
 [[Category:Shared]] <br>