Class Journal Week 9 - Revision history

Aporras1: /* Aporras1's Responses */ typo fix

2017-10-31T06:04:04Z

‎Aporras1's Responses: typo fix

Aporras1: /* Aporras1's Responses */ my responses.

2017-10-31T06:02:12Z

‎Aporras1's Responses: my responses.

Cazinge: Adding cazinge's responses

2017-10-31T05:19:28Z

Adding cazinge's responses

Ebachour: Added my response

2017-10-31T04:16:42Z

Added my response

Johnllopez616: specified the name of the gene

2017-10-31T02:58:12Z

specified the name of the gene

Johnllopez616: Added my responses for the journal entry

2017-10-31T02:56:49Z

Added my responses for the journal entry

Simonwro120: reflections

2017-10-31T02:13:24Z

reflections

Dbashour: /* Dina Bashoura's Responses */ fixed syntax

2017-10-31T01:38:35Z

‎Dina Bashoura's Responses: fixed syntax

Dbashour: added dina's responses

2017-10-31T01:38:07Z

added dina's responses

Emmatyrnauer: /* Emma Tyrnauer's Responses */ answer

2017-10-31T01:23:16Z

‎Emma Tyrnauer's Responses: answer

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 #I found that I liked SPT15 and ACT1 when compared to other pages.
 #What I liked about the SPT15 page is that they had a lot of imagery on their page (near the bottom) which made it go extremely well with their text. Furthermore they integrated buttons that allowed me to click on them to "see" the sequence which made it engaging.
-#What made ACT1 page interesting was their choice in having all their information be in tabs which you click on. I thought it was a nice change compared to others' pages but I wish it had more information and their image fit in well with the information.
+#What made ACT1 page interesting was their choice in having all their information be in tabs which you click on. I thought it was a nice change compared to others' pages but I wish it had more information and their image fit in well with the rest of their page.
 {{Template:Aporras1Links}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 31 October 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Aporras1's Responses==		==Aporras1's Responses==
		+
		+	#I found that I liked SPT15 and ACT1 when compared to other pages.
		+	#What I liked about the SPT15 page is that they had a lot of imagery on their page (near the bottom) which made it go extremely well with their text. Furthermore they integrated buttons that allowed me to click on them to "see" the sequence which made it engaging.
		+	#What made ACT1 page interesting was their choice in having all their information be in tabs which you click on. I thought it was a nice change compared to others' pages but I wish it had more information and their image fit in well with the information.

	{{Template:Aporras1Links}}		{{Template:Aporras1Links}}

@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 [[User:Dbashour|Dbashour]] ([[User talk:Dbashour|talk]]) 18:38, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
 {{template:dbashour}}
 ==Simon Wroblewski's Responses==

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 #I thought that CLN1 was also a very good page. I liked how all the information was contained in the yellow box because it helped with organization and division of each of the sections. It also made it so that the readers would not be overwhelmed when looking at all of the text.
 [[User:Emmatyrnauer|Emmatyrnauer]] ([[User talk:Emmatyrnauer|talk]]) 18:11, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
-{{Emmatyrnauer}}
+{{Emmatyrnauer}}==
 ==Nicole Kalcic's Responses==
@@ Line 95: / Line 95: @@
 [[User:Johnllopez616|Johnllopez616]] ([[User talk:Johnllopez616|talk]]) 19:56, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
 {{Template:johnllopez616}}

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 ==John Lopez's Responses==
 # Out of the pages presented, my favorites were ADH1 and ASP1.
-# Despite one of the information cards skewing to the right, I think that this page is colorful, easy to read, and provides a very nice accordion for getting specific information while providing basic access to other common parts like the summary and XML.
+# Despite one of the information cards skewing to the right, I think that ADH1 is colorful, easy to read, and provides a very nice accordion for getting specific information while providing basic access to other common parts like the summary and XML.
 # ASP1 has its information organized in a very neat format that is easy to read and displays its information nicely. In addition, the page is also colorful without being too flashy.
 [[User:Johnllopez616|Johnllopez616]] ([[User talk:Johnllopez616|talk]]) 19:56, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
 {{Template:johnllopez616}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 31 October 2017
Line 88:		Line 88:
	[[User:Simonwro120\|Simonwro120]] ([[User talk:Simonwro120\|talk]]) 19:13, 30 October 2017 (PDT)		[[User:Simonwro120\|Simonwro120]] ([[User talk:Simonwro120\|talk]]) 19:13, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
	{{simonwro120}}		{{simonwro120}}
		+
		+	==John Lopez's Responses==
		+	# Out of the pages presented, my favorites were ADH1 and ASP1.
		+	# Despite one of the information cards skewing to the right, I think that this page is colorful, easy to read, and provides a very nice accordion for getting specific information while providing basic access to other common parts like the summary and XML.
		+	# ASP1 has its information organized in a very neat format that is easy to read and displays its information nicely. In addition, the page is also colorful without being too flashy.
		+	[[User:Johnllopez616\|Johnllopez616]] ([[User talk:Johnllopez616\|talk]]) 19:56, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
		+	{{Template:johnllopez616}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 31 October 2017
Line 81:		Line 81:
	[[User:Dbashour\|Dbashour]] ([[User talk:Dbashour\|talk]]) 18:38, 30 October 2017 (PDT)		[[User:Dbashour\|Dbashour]] ([[User talk:Dbashour\|talk]]) 18:38, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
	{{template:dbashour}}		{{template:dbashour}}
		+
		+	==Simon Wroblewski's Responses==
		+	#My favorite gene pages were CLN1 and SPT15
		+	#For CLN1, I really liked the beige background on the web page, for me it really made the whole page quite aesthetically pleasing.<br> The information was substantial, well organized, and easy to find as well.
		+	#For SPT15, I'm sure I'm a little biased (because I coded it xP) but I really like the use of the buttons for the protein and nucleotide sequences because It saves so much space.<br> I also liked the formatting and spacing because it satisfies my obsessive compulsive disorder.
		+	[[User:Simonwro120\|Simonwro120]] ([[User talk:Simonwro120\|talk]]) 19:13, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
		+	{{simonwro120}}

@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 #The gene page for ACT1 is nicely organized and not too cluttered. I especially like the color coated gene ID's and how when you mouse over them, it tells you the name of the database it is linked to. I also like the accordion style used to condense the information into tabs so you can only view what you want to view, without being distracted by the other information on the page.
 #The gene page for ASP1 is also nicely organized which I like. It does not use the accordion structure but they still managed to present the information to not look cluttered. The colors used on the page make it more engaging and exciting to read. I also like the picture chosen and it's placement.
 [[User:Dbashour|Dbashour]] ([[User talk:Dbashour|talk]]) 18:38, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
 {{template:dbashour}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 31 October 2017
Line 74:		Line 74:
	#SPT15 is nice because of the organization of the text. I like the various headers and I like being introduced with a question and then a summary. It makes the information a lot easier to grasp. Also, if you are looking for something specific, you would have an easy time finding it on this page. I enjoyed the colorful graphics that were chosen, as well.		#SPT15 is nice because of the organization of the text. I like the various headers and I like being introduced with a question and then a summary. It makes the information a lot easier to grasp. Also, if you are looking for something specific, you would have an easy time finding it on this page. I enjoyed the colorful graphics that were chosen, as well.
	[[User:Nicolekalcic\|Nicolekalcic]] ([[User talk:Nicolekalcic\|talk]]) 18:13, 30 October 2017 (PDT)		[[User:Nicolekalcic\|Nicolekalcic]] ([[User talk:Nicolekalcic\|talk]]) 18:13, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
		+
		+	==Dina Bashoura's Responses==
		+	#I liked the the gene pages for ASP1 and ACT1.
		+	#The gene page for ACT1 is nicely organized and not too cluttered. I especially like the color coated gene ID's and how when you mouse over them, it tells you the name of the database it is linked to. I also like the accordion style used to condense the information into tabs so you can only view what you want to view, without being distracted by the other information on the page.
		+	#The gene page for ASP1 is also nicely organized which I like. It does not use the accordion structure but they still managed to present the information to not look cluttered. The colors used on the page make it more engaging and exciting to read. I also like the picture chosen and it's placement.
		+	<br>
		+	[[User:Dbashour\|Dbashour]] ([[User talk:Dbashour\|talk]]) 18:38, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
		+	{{template:dbashour}}

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 ==Emma Tyrnauer's Responses==
-#My favorite gene pages were
+#My favorite gene pages were ASP1 and CLN1.
+#I thought that ASP1 had really good formatting and organization. The colorful headers were very aesthetically pleasing and helped to clearly divide each of the sections. Every aspect of the page was very easily identifiable and I also liked how the image was centered at the top.
+#I thought that CLN1 was also a very good page. I liked how all the information was contained in the yellow box because it helped with organization and division of each of the sections. It also made it so that the readers would not be overwhelmed when looking at all of the text.
 [[User:Emmatyrnauer|Emmatyrnauer]] ([[User talk:Emmatyrnauer|talk]]) 18:11, 30 October 2017 (PDT)
 {{Emmatyrnauer}}