User talk:Cazinge - Revision history

Dondi: Week 11 feedback.

2017-12-10T02:38:01Z

Week 11 feedback.

Dondi: Add week 9 feedback.

2017-11-24T02:12:10Z

Add week 9 feedback.

Dondi: /* Week 7 Feedback */ Punctuation.

2017-11-21T06:46:39Z

‎Week 7 Feedback: Punctuation.

Dondi: Add signature.

2017-11-21T06:04:54Z

Add signature.

Dondi: Add week 7 feedback.

2017-11-21T06:03:31Z

Add week 7 feedback.

Kdahlquist: /* Week 11 Team Page Feedback (to address in Week 12) */ add a couple more points to week 11 feedback

2017-11-16T22:05:23Z

‎Week 11 Team Page Feedback (to address in Week 12): add a couple more points to week 11 feedback

Dondi: Add team page feedback.

2017-11-16T08:20:54Z

Add team page feedback.

Dondi: Add week 5 shared journal feedback.

2017-10-22T01:53:09Z

Add week 5 shared journal feedback.

Dondi: Provide Week 4 feedback.

2017-10-03T05:20:09Z

Provide Week 4 feedback.

Dondi: Submit week 3 feedback.

2017-09-24T05:44:02Z

Submit week 3 feedback.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:38, 10 December 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:

	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 14:05, 16 November 2017 (PST)''		''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 14:05, 16 November 2017 (PST)''
		+
		+	== Week 11 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* These "good habit" items were not met in this submission:
		+	** Punctuality: last edit at 12:08am 11/14.
		+	** No electronic laboratory notebook—note that we have consistently used the term “laboratory notebook” this semester to represent documentation of your process for the week, distinct from the week’s deliverables. No such narrative could be found in the journal entry.
		+	* Design or development term notes
		+	** The reference for ''plug-in'' is a tertiary-source Wikipedia article.
		+	** The PostgreSQL link is a 404.
		+	* Article outline notes
		+	** Outline was 1 page long in print preview.
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 18:38, 9 December 2017 (PST)

	== Week 9 Feedback ==		== Week 9 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 24 November 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:

	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 14:05, 16 November 2017 (PST)''		''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 14:05, 16 November 2017 (PST)''
		+
		+	== Week 9 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* The “good habit” aspects of your individual journal are mostly fulfilled except:
		+	** Acknowledgments/signature and references were added 3-7 days late.
		+	** The references list only includes the Week 9 assignment; this particular assignment references API documentation as well, at the very least.
		+	* The electronic notebook is in brief narrative form but does convey the process of arriving at the API calls.
		+	* GRNsight testing is complete with clear feedback on the results.
		+	* The provided '''bash''' script specifies the instructions for arriving at the gene data, including the portions that get substituted based on the desired gene and the final URL that yields the gene data from the assigned source.
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+	Questions and “good habit” aspects are all fulfilled, all on-time. Favorite pages are stated alongside the reasons for these preferences.
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 18:12, 23 November 2017 (PST)

	== Week 7 Feedback ==		== Week 7 Feedback ==

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 * The “good habit” aspects of your individual journal are mostly on point except that the electronic notebook is somewhat short on detail (though the brevity is explained with a candidness that is noted). The reference list is thorough.
 * Nearly all prior web page issues were addressed except:
-** Title tag was not modified to match gene
+** Title tag was not modified to match gene.
-** Although the UniProt ID was fixed, its label wasn’t: the UniProt ID is not a ''taxonomic'' ID
+** Although the UniProt ID was fixed, its label wasn’t: the UniProt ID is not a ''taxonomic'' ID.
-* Bootstrap grid layout and flex classes were seen, though used somewhat subtly
+* Bootstrap grid layout and flex classes were seen, though used somewhat subtly.
-* The use of collapse is noted as one of the requested “advanced Bootstrap” features
+* The use of collapse is noted as one of the requested “advanced Bootstrap” features.
-* The use of card is noted as the other “advanced Bootstrap” feature, though it’s usage does not really maximize its potential
+* The use of card is noted as the other “advanced Bootstrap” feature, though its usage does not really maximize its potential.
-* The XML and JSON API calls were adapted correctly
+* The XML and JSON API calls were adapted correctly.
 === Shared Journal ===

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 === Shared Journal ===
 Questions and “good habit” aspects are fulfilled, all on-time. Your comment on your interest primarily being on the computer science side is noted, and that’s fine as long as you continue to retain proficiency in the biology aspect even if the interest level is not that high. When developing software for others, it is important that we acquire a firsthand sense of our user base’s needs, interests, and perspective; this is how we are able to create software to truly fulfill that user base’s needs, as opposed to just checking off requirements without fully appreciating why those requirements are the way they are.
 == Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 21 November 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:

	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 14:05, 16 November 2017 (PST)''		''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 14:05, 16 November 2017 (PST)''
		+
		+	== Week 7 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* The “good habit” aspects of your individual journal are mostly on point except that the electronic notebook is somewhat short on detail (though the brevity is explained with a candidness that is noted). The reference list is thorough.
		+	* Nearly all prior web page issues were addressed except:
		+	** Title tag was not modified to match gene
		+	** Although the UniProt ID was fixed, its label wasn’t: the UniProt ID is not a ''taxonomic'' ID
		+	* Bootstrap grid layout and flex classes were seen, though used somewhat subtly
		+	* The use of collapse is noted as one of the requested “advanced Bootstrap” features
		+	* The use of card is noted as the other “advanced Bootstrap” feature, though it’s usage does not really maximize its potential
		+	* The XML and JSON API calls were adapted correctly
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+	Questions and “good habit” aspects are fulfilled, all on-time. Your comment on your interest primarily being on the computer science side is noted, and that’s fine as long as you continue to retain proficiency in the biology aspect even if the interest level is not that high. When developing software for others, it is important that we acquire a firsthand sense of our user base’s needs, interests, and perspective; this is how we are able to create software to truly fulfill that user base’s needs, as opposed to just checking off requirements without fully appreciating why those requirements are the way they are.

	== Week 5 Feedback ==		== Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 16 November 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:

	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 00:20, 16 November 2017 (PST)		—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 00:20, 16 November 2017 (PST)
		+
		+	I also want to note that Eddie did not sign his executive summary/reflection with his wiki signature. The citations in you annotated bibliography should also be added to your team page.
		+
		+	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 14:05, 16 November 2017 (PST)''

	== Week 5 Feedback ==		== Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 16 November 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 11 Team Page Feedback (to address in Week 12) ==
		+
		+	Your team page hit the specifically-requested items listed in the Week 11 assignment, although the team template [[Template:Gene hAPI]] is somewhat underpopulated—continue reading to get further ideas on what can go there.
		+
		+	For [[Week 12]], let’s focus on the stated overall purpose of these pages: “This page will be the main place from which your team project will be managed. Include all of the information/links that you think will be useful for your team to organize your work and communicate with each other and with the instructors. ''Hint: the kinds of things that are on your own User pages and on the course Main page can be used as a guide.''”
		+
		+	Considering that purpose (and hint), you will also want to include the following on your team page. Imagine yourselves in deep work mode, with your team page open in a window. What information, links, and resources will you want to have available on that page at all times? Here are a few items:
		+	* A projected schedule with due dates (both for milestones already defined in the guild pages and for internal accomplishments that your team determines) and meeting times. You can cross off these dates and times as your team makes progress using the <code>s</code> tag (<s>strikeout</s>).
		+	* Communication resources (e.g., additional channels like Slack; GitHub issues; the discussion “side” of various wiki pages; etc.) that your team can use to coordinate when not face-to-face
		+	* A section with links to uploaded files, particularly for use by data analysts but really for any member of the team; this can also include a link to your GitHub branch and the project’s fork
		+	* Additional useful links—what links would be useful to always have there so that you can just click to visit them, minimizing typing? (for example, [[Template:GRNsight Gene Page Project Links]] has already been created for you—won’t that be useful to have on your page as well?)
		+	Note how these items are very similar to the content that can be seen on our own [[Main Page]]—this is not a coincidence.
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 00:20, 16 November 2017 (PST)
		+
	== Week 5 Feedback ==		== Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 22 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 5 Feedback ==
		+
		+	(work in progress)
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+	Questions and “good habit” aspects are fulfilled, except that the entry itself was submitted 8 minutes late.
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 18:53, 21 October 2017 (PDT)
		+
	== Week 4 Feedback ==		== Week 4 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 3 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 4 Feedback ==
		+
		+	=== Individual Journal ===
		+
		+	* You’ve gotten a lot of the “good habit” tasks down, but not all. For this week:
		+	** The individual journal landed 19 minutes late…
		+	** …in a single edit! So kind of a double-whammy there. Had you edited more granularly, some edits might have landed on time. At least that single edit had a message.
		+	* Your lab notebook remains on the brief side but does include the kinds of details we like to see. If you integrate note-taking further into your workflow, I think the detail will naturally flow from there.
		+	* Your references were as requested except that the Week 3 reference was not updated to Week 4.
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+
		+	* Most questions and “good habit” points are fulfilled except:
		+	** There is no link from your shared journal back to your user page.
		+	** There is no wiki signature on your shared entry…which is somewhat ironic because you set up the template with a very clear placeholder for the signature 🤔
		+
		+	=== Web Page ===
		+
		+	(both homework partners get the same feedback)
		+
		+	Most gene page requirements were fulfilled except:
		+	* Filenames and title element weren’t customized to your chosen gene
		+	* A separate gene summary paragraph was not seen
		+	* The displayed Ensembl gene ID doesn't match the ID in the link
		+	* The displayed UniProt ID is the taxon (organism) ID—note the link has a different value (plus there is a typo in the UniProt label)
		+	* Acknowledgments and References should have had separate headings, plus Week 3 was not updated to Week 4
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 22:20, 2 October 2017 (PDT)
		+
	== Week 3 Feedback ==		== Week 3 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 24 September 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 3 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* Everything was turned in on time—good job! You also fulfilled the “good habit/best practice” aspects of the assignment, including supplying comments for all 13 of the listed journal edits.
		+	* You supplied an electronic notebook with this assignment, but it only covered the '''sed''' portion of the assignment and could still use additional detail. Openness and reproducibility are the values that we are after here: can someone reading your notebook get a clear understanding of what you did for this assignment? Do they have enough information to replicate the results that you posted on your journal page?
		+	* Your hack-a-page work certainly fulfilled the instructions, but was the “shmoogle” image made by you? Or did you download it? Note how a thorough notebook (or acknowledgments) would answer this question before it even gets asked.
		+	* Your list of links was quite thorough, including the '''cgi''' links for the reading frames, which I was hoping that students would catch. However…
		+	* …I was also hoping that the values after '''seqdna''' in those links would be recognized by students as IDs. You listed element IDs, which are technically correct, but as noted there were other IDs on this page beyond those kinds.
		+	* The note that you did this alone causes some concern. Was this your choice? Beyond your control? If the latter, please notify Dr. Dahlquist or myself in case it needs our inquiry or intervention. Fortunately, this assignment leaned toward the computer science side, toward which you are already comfortable. In other circumstances, not having a partner would have had more negative consequences.
		+	* Your shared journal answers definitely align with my views and the views of others—to this day I still sometimes miss the occasional important character, and there is truly a need to keep doing what we’re doing in order to stay sharp.
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 22:44, 23 September 2017 (PDT)
		+
	== Week 2 Feedback ==		== Week 2 Feedback ==