User talk:Mbalducc - Revision history

Kdahlquist: add link to GRNmap input file

2017-12-07T08:37:48Z

add link to GRNmap input file

Dondi: Add week 9 feedback.

2017-11-24T02:29:38Z

Add week 9 feedback.

Dondi: /* Week 7 Feedback */ Punctuation.

2017-11-21T06:44:22Z

‎Week 7 Feedback: Punctuation.

Dondi: Add week 7 feedback.

2017-11-21T06:43:40Z

Add week 7 feedback.

Kdahlquist: added week 10 feedback

2017-11-17T07:29:38Z

added week 10 feedback

Kdahlquist: /* Week 8 Feedback */ gave week 8 feedback

2017-11-17T00:57:35Z

‎Week 8 Feedback: gave week 8 feedback

Kdahlquist: add week 11 team feedback

2017-11-16T21:54:14Z

add week 11 team feedback

Kdahlquist: create header for week 8 feedback

2017-11-15T21:14:22Z

create header for week 8 feedback

Dondi: Add week 5 shared journal feedback.

2017-10-22T02:00:11Z

Add week 5 shared journal feedback.

Dondi: Provide Week 4 feedback.

2017-10-03T05:39:04Z

Provide Week 4 feedback.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 7 December 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	Mary, I've made the GRNmap input file for use in class on Thursday: [[Media:17-genes_19-edges_team-hAPI_Sigmoid_estimation.xlsx \| 17-genes_19-edges_team-hAPI_Sigmoid_estimation.xlsx]]. ''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 00:37, 7 December 2017 (PST)''
		+
	== Week 10 Feedback ==		== Week 10 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 24 November 2017
Line 34:		Line 34:

	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 13:54, 16 November 2017 (PST)''		''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 13:54, 16 November 2017 (PST)''
		+
		+	== Week 9 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* The “good habit” aspects of your individual journal are almost fulfilled and on-time. An unusually low subset of the listed submissions in the page’s history have a summary, 9/24.
		+	* The electronic notebook has good detail and is clear in its bulleted form.
		+	* GRNsight testing is complete with clear feedback on the results.
		+	* The final URL for the desired gene data is given correctly, along with the portions to substitute depending on the desired gene as well as the overall process for going from the gene symbol to the final gene data.
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+	Questions and “good habit” aspects are all fulfilled, all on-time. Favorite pages are stated alongside the reasons for these preferences.
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 18:29, 23 November 2017 (PST)

	== Week 8 Feedback ==		== Week 8 Feedback ==

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 * The “good habit” aspects of your individual journal are mostly on point, except that the signature is missing from the acknowledgments section and the references are somewhat minimal—certainly more material was used in this assignment than just the instructions?
 * Nearly all prior web page issues were addressed except:
-** Title tag was not modified to match gene
+** Title tag was not modified to match gene.
-** The gene page does not have its own acknowledgments section (separate from the one in your individual journal page)
+** The gene page does not have its own acknowledgments section (separate from the one in your individual journal page).
-** The gene page does not have its own references section (separate from the one in your individual journal page)
+** The gene page does not have its own references section (separate from the one in your individual journal page).
-* Bootstrap grid layout and flex classes were seen, though used somewhat subtly and on small subsets of the page
+* Bootstrap grid layout and flex classes were seen, though used somewhat subtly and on small subsets of the page.
-* The use of collapse is noted as one of the requested “advanced Bootstrap” features
+* The use of collapse is noted as one of the requested “advanced Bootstrap” features.
-* The use of card is noted as the other “advanced Bootstrap” feature, though its usage does not really maximize its potential
+* The use of card is noted as the other “advanced Bootstrap” feature, though its usage does not really maximize its potential.
-* The XML and JSON API calls were adapted correctly
+* The XML and JSON API calls were adapted correctly.
 === Shared Journal ===

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:43, 21 November 2017
Line 56:		Line 56:

	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 16:57, 16 November 2017 (PST)''		''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 16:57, 16 November 2017 (PST)''
		+
		+	== Week 7 Feedback ==
		+
		+	* The “good habit” aspects of your individual journal are mostly on point, except that the signature is missing from the acknowledgments section and the references are somewhat minimal—certainly more material was used in this assignment than just the instructions?
		+	* Nearly all prior web page issues were addressed except:
		+	** Title tag was not modified to match gene
		+	** The gene page does not have its own acknowledgments section (separate from the one in your individual journal page)
		+	** The gene page does not have its own references section (separate from the one in your individual journal page)
		+	* Bootstrap grid layout and flex classes were seen, though used somewhat subtly and on small subsets of the page
		+	* The use of collapse is noted as one of the requested “advanced Bootstrap” features
		+	* The use of card is noted as the other “advanced Bootstrap” feature, though its usage does not really maximize its potential
		+	* The XML and JSON API calls were adapted correctly
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+	Questions and “good habit” aspects are fulfilled, all on-time. Good to see that the out-of-comfort exposure is looking just right for you. It is tricky to strike a balance between sufficient exposure to do something substantive alongside skipping some basics and practice in order to save time, but it's looking like the mix is generally OK for you except for the need for more practice.
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 22:43, 20 November 2017 (PST)

	== Week 5 Feedback ==		== Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 17 November 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 10 Feedback ==
		+
		+	I have reviewed your Week 10 individual journal assignment so that you can move forward with the final project. Thank you for submitting the assignment on time and for providing all of the required links. You fulfilled all of the criteria for the assignment, except those things I note below. You will need to make corrections to these before moving forward with the project. Please go ahead and fix them on your Week 10 page. Your weekly electronic notebook for the project can then link to your Week 10 page, just noting the corrections you made.
		+	# Your electronic notebook is insufficient.
		+	#* While I deemed it acceptable to copy and paste it from the assignment page, it needs to be '''''modified''''' as well. Your notebook needs to be in the ''past'' tense because it is something that you did.
		+	#* If there were issues with running the protocol, those need to be noted.
		+	#* When you talk about saving files, please record the actual filename in your notebook for reference.
		+	#* Be attentive to writing something in the summary field '''''every''''' time you make a change to the wiki.
		+	# While you reported the definitions of your 6 GO terms, you did not provide an interpretation with respect to cold shock or the deletion of the Cin5 transcription factor.
		+	# You included a summary paragraph, but your summary did not draw any conclusions about the data analysis you performed with respect to what is noted in number 2 above.
		+	# The gene list and GO list files were provided (make sure that they have the correct file extensions). However, you did not provide the updated Excel workbook with the "stem" worksheet, nor the .txt file used as input for stem. In the interests of reproducible research, these files must be provided.
		+	# The PowerPoint with the screenshots of the stem results was also not found. Without this, I was unable to really review your results. These screenshots will be included in your final presentation and report.
		+	# You did not actually mention which profile you chose until the summary paragraph. This information is critical to your notebook. You reversed the number of genes that belonged to the profile versus expected. The profile you chose has a relatively small number of genes. It would be better to choose one of the profiles with at least 100 genes for the further analysis in the final project.
		+	# In your Acknowledgments section, you need to be explicit that you copied and modified the instructions from the Week 10 assignment.
		+	# In your References section, you need to cite the stem software that you used as well as each of the GO term definitions, not just the general Gene Ontology site.
		+
		+	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 23:29, 16 November 2017 (PST)''
		+
	== Week 11 Team Page Feedback (to address in Week 12) ==		== Week 11 Team Page Feedback (to address in Week 12) ==

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 == Week 8 Feedback ==
-Stay tuned...
+I have reviewed your Week 8 individual journal assignment so that you can move forward with the final project.
 == Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 16 November 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 11 Team Page Feedback (to address in Week 12) ==
		+
		+	You covered some of the basics for your team page, but some specifically requested items were missing:
		+	* You need to add a category with your team's name, i.e., "Page Desiigner".
		+	* Please remove the category "Assignment" from your page/template.
		+	* Arash's executive summary should provide a link to his Week 11 individual assignment page.
		+
		+	In addition, for [[Week 12]], let’s focus on the stated overall purpose of these pages: “This page will be the main place from which your team project will be managed. Include all of the information/links that you think will be useful for your team to organize your work and communicate with each other and with the instructors. ''Hint: the kinds of things that are on your own User pages and on the course Main page can be used as a guide.''”
		+
		+	Considering that purpose (and hint), you will also want to include the following on your team page. Imagine yourselves in deep work mode, with your team page open in a window. What information, links, and resources will you want to have available on that page at all times? Here are a few items:
		+	* A projected schedule with due dates (both for milestones already defined in the guild pages and for internal accomplishments that your team determines) and meeting times. You can cross off these dates and times as your team makes progress using the <code>s</code> tag (<s>strikeout</s>).
		+	* Communication resources (e.g., additional channels like Slack; GitHub issues; the discussion “side” of various wiki pages; etc.) that your team can use to coordinate when not face-to-face
		+	* A section with links to uploaded files (including the journal club presentations), particularly for use by data analysts but really for any member of the team; this can also include a link to your GitHub branch and the project’s fork
		+	* Additional useful links—what links would be useful to always have there so that you can just click to visit them, minimizing typing? You did include the [[Template:GRNsight Gene Page Project Links]], but then redundantly added a separate list of guild links.
		+	* Finally, having consistent formatting for the executive summaries and reflections will improve the look and organization of your page. Hayden and Arash should fix the formatting of their bullet points.
		+
		+	''— [[User:Kdahlquist\|Kdahlquist]] ([[User talk:Kdahlquist\|talk]]) 13:54, 16 November 2017 (PST)''
		+
	== Week 8 Feedback ==		== Week 8 Feedback ==

		+	Stay tuned...

	== Week 5 Feedback ==		== Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 15 November 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 8 Feedback ==
		+
		+
	== Week 5 Feedback ==		== Week 5 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 22 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 5 Feedback ==
		+
		+	(work in progress)
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+	Questions and “good habit” aspects are all sufficiently fulfilled; thank you!
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 19:00, 21 October 2017 (PDT)
		+
	== Week 4 Feedback ==		== Week 4 Feedback ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:39, 3 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Week 4 Feedback ==
		+
		+	=== Individual Journal ===
		+
		+	* Great work on your individual journal! All “good habit” items are addressed, it was submitted on time, you spaced your work out well (9 edits), and had summary entries for all of them.
		+	* Your electronic notebook has sufficient detail and includes some very specific notes, giving it genuine individuality and keeping it from sounding like it could have been anyone else's process.
		+
		+	=== Shared Journal ===
		+
		+	* All questions and “good habit” points are fulfilled—once again, good job!
		+	** Note that the standard library you used here does have a name: Bootstrap
		+	** Indeed the flip side of widespread information availability is the loss of privacy and potential misinformation
		+
		+	=== Web Page ===
		+
		+	(both homework partners get the same feedback)
		+
		+	Most gene page requirements were fulfilled except:
		+	* Your folder name and title element weren’t customized to your chosen gene, and the folder name wasn't all lowercase as specified
		+	* Your link to the ''.zip'' file used <code>File:</code> rather than <code>Media:</code>; although this was not directly stipulated in the instructions, note that <code>Media:</code> leads to a download immediately, making it more convenient for the reader. If you want to accommodate readers who would like to see the file metadata, provide both links.
		+	* A separate gene summary paragraph was not seen
		+	* The content for gene function, differences, and reason for choosing the gene all work OK, but the choice of presentation is not ideal—controlling the “slideshow” isn’t obvious and this distracts from simply reading the information that you provided
		+	* The image choice could have been better…stopping at just bread was somewhat generic, and not distinctive to your gene
		+	* The web page was supposed to have its own Acknowledgments and References too
		+
		+	—[[User:Dondi\|Dondi]] ([[User talk:Dondi\|talk]]) 22:39, 2 October 2017 (PDT)
		+
	== Week 2 Feedback ==		== Week 2 Feedback ==