Difference between revisions of "MiRPathDB Week 5"

From LMU BioDB 2017
Jump to: navigation, search
(added to scientific quaility section)
(added to scientific quality section)
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
*# Does the content appear to completely cover its content domain? '''Answer:''' This database seems to have very strong coverage of the targets and pathways of mRNAs, but has not information on the mRNAs themselves. While this does align with what the database claims to cover, information on the mRNAs themselves would allow for a more full coverage of the field.(https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/45/D1/D90/2290890/miRPathDB-a-new-dictionary-on-microRNAs-and-target) (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/overview.html)
 
*# Does the content appear to completely cover its content domain? '''Answer:''' This database seems to have very strong coverage of the targets and pathways of mRNAs, but has not information on the mRNAs themselves. While this does align with what the database claims to cover, information on the mRNAs themselves would allow for a more full coverage of the field.(https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/45/D1/D90/2290890/miRPathDB-a-new-dictionary-on-microRNAs-and-target) (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/overview.html)
*#* How many records does the database contain? '''Answer:''' Contains records for primarily ''Homo sapiens'' but also has records on ''Mus musculus'' for comparison purposes. There are a total of 2,599 human mRNAs contained in the DB with 14,773 experimentally validated target genes and 19281 predicted targets genes. Also a total of 12,875 biochemical pathway categories. (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/overview.html)
+
*#* How many records does the database contain? '''Answer:''' Contains records for primarily ''Homo sapiens'' but also has records on ''Mus musculus'' for comparison purposes. There are a total of 2,599 human mRNAs contained in the DB with 14,773 experimentally validated target genes and 19281 predicted targets genes. Also a total of 12,875 biochemical pathway categories. As for ''Mus musculus'', there are 1,933 miRNA covered and 8,201 biochemical pathways categories. (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/overview.html) and (https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/45/D1/D90/2290890/miRPathDB-a-new-dictionary-on-microRNAs-and-target)
 
*#* What claims do the database owners make about coverage in the corresponding paper? '''Answer:''' They claim to cover a broad range of mRNAs (primarily in ''Home sapiens'') in regards to target genes, and functional pathways for mRNAs to show how they function. (https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/45/D1/D90/2290890/miRPathDB-a-new-dictionary-on-microRNAs-and-target)
 
*#* What claims do the database owners make about coverage in the corresponding paper? '''Answer:''' They claim to cover a broad range of mRNAs (primarily in ''Home sapiens'') in regards to target genes, and functional pathways for mRNAs to show how they function. (https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/45/D1/D90/2290890/miRPathDB-a-new-dictionary-on-microRNAs-and-target)
 
*# What species are covered in the database? '''Answer:''' Primarily ''Homo sapiens'' with some information on ''Mus musculus'' for comparison purposes. (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/overview.html)
 
*# What species are covered in the database? '''Answer:''' Primarily ''Homo sapiens'' with some information on ''Mus musculus'' for comparison purposes. (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/overview.html)

Revision as of 04:22, 2 October 2017

As homework partner, Quinn Lanners and John Lopez worked together to analyze the miRPathDB database by following the template laid out on the week 5 assignment page.

To start this weeks assignment, we selected a database from one of the ones on the Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue Table of Contents 2017. After we had selected a database, and it was approved by Dr. Dahlquist, we began work on the assignment.

To make better use of our time, we decided on Thursday to break up the questions between ourselves. Then we could work separately on our own time to find the answers before coming together to put all of the information into a PowerPoint presentation. We decided that John would handle the questions "General Utility" questions of the database, while Quinn would handle the "Scientific Quality" questions of the database. As for the "General Information", which we figured would be easier to determine, we decided to answer those questions each individually as we looked into our specific part. Since the database research was broken up in this manner, the following section of the electronic journal is comprised of two separate accounts from each of us about how we retrieved the answers to our assigned questions.

  • Scientific Quality:

I aimed to answer the following questions regarding our database:

  • Scientific quality of the database
    1. Does the content appear to completely cover its content domain?
      • How many records does the database contain?
      • What claims do the database owners make about coverage in the corresponding paper?
    2. What species are covered in the database?
    3. Is the database content useful? I.e., what biological questions can it be used to answer?
    4. Is the database content timely?
      • Is there a need in the scientific community for such a database at this time?
      • Is the content covered by other databases already?
      • When did the database first go online?
      • How often is the database updated?
      • When was the last update?

In order to answer these questions I read the article covering the miRPathDB from the Nucleic Acids Research and by analyzing the actual miRPathDB website.

  • General Utility:
  1. Whenever a search is performed for an miRNA molecule, the database provides a link to that molecule from the following sites: (http://www.mirbase.org/). It also directs you to a link that tells you what tissue that molecule might be located in using the following site: (https://ccb-web.cs.uni-saarland.de/tissueatlas/patterns). NOTE: It will link you to these databases whether or not you search a mouse or human miRNA. Sources: (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/mirna.html?mirna=hsa-miR-1976&organism=hsa), (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/mirna.html?mirna=hsa-miR-1976&organism=mmu)
  2. It is very convenient to browse the data since it is organized first by species (human or mouse), then since the database is organized in a matrix, you can view the database and search through it by either the individual MiRNA and what pathways it is involved in or the pathways that contain the given kind of MiRNA.Source: (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/pathways.html?organism=hsa)
  3. It is somewhat convenient to download the data. The raw data is first given in both .tar.gz format and .zip on a designated page. While .zip is the standard way to compress a file, a .tar.gz acts as a container for compressed files and unless you are using Linux or MacOS, you need a software to open it. Finally, each of the queries can be downloaded into a new spreadsheet in either .xlsx or .csv format, both of which are standard formats. Sources: (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/download.html), (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/pathway.html?database=KEGG&pathway=MicroRNAs%20in%20cancer&organism=hsa)
  4. I would say that the website is extremely well organized. It contains a very detailed tutorial in both a web page form and a .pdf download. The search options are very well-organized since they are separated by species, and the results can be either by pathway or by molecule. When I ran a query for the molecule "hsa-miR-1976" for example, two tables were returned that contained well organized-data that had their own search queries. Source: (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/mirna.html?mirna=hsa-miR-1976&organism=hsa)
  5. There are no restrictions on access nor is there a license agreement to use the database. Source: (https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/about.html)

After we had both individually researched the answers to our questions, we met