Difference between revisions of "Aporras1 Week 1"
(Added and reordered references) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| + | #Denning, P. J. (2008). The profession of IT Voices of computing. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 19-21. | ||
| + | #Denning, P. J. (2007). Computing is a natural science. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 13-18. | ||
| + | #Janovy, J. (2004). On becoming a biologist. U of Nebraska Press. | ||
#LMU BioDB 2017. (2017). Week 1. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2017/index.php/Week_1 | #LMU BioDB 2017. (2017). Week 1. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2017/index.php/Week_1 | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 05:43, 5 September 2017
Contents
Before Reading the Denning articles
When I hear the term computer science, I think mostly of coding programs for endless possible reasons and how to design processes for computers to complete towards a certain end. When older relatives or friends hear the term computer science, my best guess would be they would be thinking of the study of how computers work. I would guess more so in the physical sense and less in the world of networks and programming. I think my friends would have similar thoughts come to mind in terms of networks, the internet, and programming/coding come to mind when they think of computer science because we grew up with computers in our households.
Before Reading the Janovy chapter
When I think about biology, the study of life and intricate biological systems comes to mind. Life overall represents the beautiful product that is made by the intricate and time-tested biological systems. By biological systems, I hope to encompass the aspect of biology that takes apart the larger picture of what it means for something to be a living organism. Just as importantly, Charles Darwin definitely comes into mind when thinking about biology. With all honesty, I wouldn't consider myself a biologist. I would more so consider myself an aspiring biologist in the sense that I would hope to one day be able to take part in or contribute research within the biology field.
After Reading the Denning articles and Janovy chapter
After reading the Denning articles and the Janovy chapter, answer the following questions:
What was the purpose of these readings? Which of the voices in the Voices of Computing article seem to appeal to you the most? Apply one of the seven principles from the Computing is a Natural Science article to something as "non-computer-science"-y as possible, either from other subjects or your daily life. What did you find most interesting or provocative about the Janovy reading? What does it mean to be a biologist? Do you consider yourself a biologist? Why or why not?
Aporras1 (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2017 (PDT)
Acknowledgements
- John Lopez and I met outside of class in case either of us had any questions in formatting our user pages, journal entry pages, or templates. We also texted in order to communicate beforehand if we had any questions prior to meeting.
References
- Denning, P. J. (2008). The profession of IT Voices of computing. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 19-21.
- Denning, P. J. (2007). Computing is a natural science. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 13-18.
- Janovy, J. (2004). On becoming a biologist. U of Nebraska Press.
- LMU BioDB 2017. (2017). Week 1. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2017/index.php/Week_1
