Difference between revisions of "Ebachour Week 8"
From LMU BioDB 2017
(Adding notes for the electronic journal) |
(Added more for the E-Journal.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Our different times were 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 | * Our different times were 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 | ||
15: 4 | 15: 4 | ||
| + | |||
30: 4 | 30: 4 | ||
| + | |||
60: 4 | 60: 4 | ||
| + | |||
90: 3 | 90: 3 | ||
| + | |||
120: 3 | 120: 3 | ||
| + | |||
TOTAL NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 18 | TOTAL NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 18 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Edit: Turns out the second label wasn't meant to be t120. It was just a duplicate of the t90, so we talked to Dr. Dahlquist and she told us to just eliminate all of those columns. | ||
| + | |||
| + | At step 22, I got the number 1628. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Benjamini and Hochberg #5 says that I should have | ||
Revision as of 01:21, 22 October 2017
Electronic Journal
Notes
- Number of NA's: 10854
- t120 was labeled t90-1.1 - t90-4.1 so we had to change to t120
- Our different times were 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120
15: 4
30: 4
60: 4
90: 3
120: 3
TOTAL NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 18
Edit: Turns out the second label wasn't meant to be t120. It was just a duplicate of the t90, so we talked to Dr. Dahlquist and she told us to just eliminate all of those columns.
At step 22, I got the number 1628.
Benjamini and Hochberg #5 says that I should have
