User talk:Zvanysse

Week 2 Feedback

• Thank you for turning in your assignment on time.
• The only link to your User page was found in your wiki signature. The category was also missing. Please add these links to your template and be sure to invoke it subesquent journal entries, if you haven't already.
• You wrote something in the summary field for 0 of 10 saves (0%) in the period of review; since you had only received the feedback about frequency after you submmitted this assignment, I am expecting that this number will be improving in subsequent weeks!
• The number of total saves to your Week 2 journal entry is was 8, which is a little lower than what we would expect for this exercise.
• Your translations were correct, except for leaving out one "A" from frame -1 and misreading "W" as "stop" twice. (Intersting side note, in some organisms one of the stop codons is translated as "W", just not in this exercise.)
• Your determination of which frames contained ORFs was correct.
• Technically, you should have given the complementary DNA sequence, as requested. Instead, you converted the T's to U's to make an RNA sequence. Be careful to follow the directions and give what is asked for.
  • The conversion of T to U occurs during transcription. The decoding of the genetic code occurs duing translation.
• Also, we do not use 5' and 3' to mark the ends of protein sequences. Instead, we use N-ter and C-ter.
• I did not find any electronic lab notebook for this assignment. In this case, the lab notebook would have explained how you arrived at your answers to the questions posed in the exercise. Please be sure to keep your electronic lab notebook for future assignments.
• In your Acknowledgments section, you left out the required statement (see the Week 1 assignment). This will be required each week.
• In the references section, please make sure you are providing a complete citation in APA format, not just a like to the resource you used.
• The technical language in articles from the primary literature is definitely a hurdle for students (and even for faculty from a different field), but keep with it. Like with other fields of endeavor, it is good to take a look at the primary source. Instead of just relying on your memory for terminology, you can always look something up online or in a text book or dictionary. I have to do that myself when I am reading something from a different field.

— Kdahlquist (talk) 23:19, 23 September 2017 (PDT)

Week 1 Feedback

Thank you for submitting your work on time. Your Week 1 work has been reviewed, and the following points of improvement have been identified. Other than these items, your wiki skills and deliverables checked out OK:

• 15 edits were made to your user page—a good, gradual pace—but only around 7 of those had a summary message. Please make it a habit to provide a summary, no matter how small the change might be.
• There is a difference between internal wiki links (double bracket) and external links (single bracket). The link on the main page to your user page is written out as if it were an external link, but it is more compact if written as an internal one.
• Three levels of headings were requested, but only two were noted in your submission.
• The Acknowledgments section did not have a wiki signature.
• No References section was seen (recall that, at a minimum, it should have had a link to the Week 1 instructions).

For your shared journal response, all requested items were noted. Thank you for answering the questions!

—Dondi (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2017 (PDT)