User talk:Johnllopez616
From LMU BioDB 2017
Week 2 Feedback
- Thank you for turning in your assignment on time.
- You wrote something in the summary field for 5 of 5 saves (100%) in the period of review.
- However, the number of total saves is quite small. We are encouraging you to save your work in smaller "chunks"; a range of 10-20 saves is what would have been expected for this assignment.
- Your complementary DNA sequence was correct.
- Your translations were correct.
- Your determination of which frames contained ORFs was correct.
- Please indicate the ends of your protein sequence with "N-ter" and "C-ter", which is what we use to mark the ends of proteins.
- Your User page was missing the link to the Week 2 assignment. Please add those links to your template and invoke your template on both your User page and individual journal entry pages for the future.
- I did not find any electronic lab notebook for this assignment. In this case, the lab notebook would have explained how you arrived at your answers to the questions posed in the exercise. Please be sure to keep your electronic lab notebook for future assignments.
- The technical language in articles from the primary literature is definitely a hurdle for students (and even for faculty from a different field), but keep with it. Like with other fields of endeavor, it is good to take a look at the primary source.
— Kdahlquist (talk) 11:44, 20 September 2017 (PDT)
Week 1 Feedback
I’m happy to report that all requested wiki skills and deliverables were noted and seen to be implemented correctly. We won’t count email misspellings against you 😁