Template:Bhamilton18 Shared Week 4
From LMU BioDB 2017
Revision as of 05:08, 26 September 2017 by Bhamilton18 (talk | contribs) (fixed typos and edited responses)
- Based on the readings/assignment this week:
- Yes, we coded in HTML.
- Yes, we used HTML syntax with formatting from Bootstrap.
- Yes, often when coding assignments and tasks coders are required to finish them quickly as they affect companies websites and day-to-day activities very drastically. Often when rushed to fix a bug or problem coders can come off blunt and aggressive, not because they are angry, but because they are "crunched" for time.
- I believe today's HTML is even more easy to learn than back then as there are many resources to access when learning HTML. Luckily, as Tim Lee envisioned HTML is open and free to use, but it has only gotten better. More unique options are available for stylist purposes and things like Bootstrap have been created to make the most novice of coders look like they know what they are doing. Although HTML is easy to learn, I believe some of the code is quite tedious compared to other languages. For example when using Java the need to use a close tag for every line is unnecessary.
- I liked UniProt the best as it was the easiest to access all the information quickly and had the easiest titles to follow. The ability to close and focus on certain topics also made the information more interesting to read and understand. I felt that Ensembl was my least favorite as it had harsh presentation and the labeling for graphs and/or topics made a bit advanced for just any user to look at.
