Difference between revisions of "Dmadere Week 11"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added title) |
(→Annotated Bibliography: added bibliography items) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Annotated Bibliography== | ==Annotated Bibliography== | ||
+ | |||
+ | #Ibstedt, S., Sideri, T. C., Grant, C. M., & Tamás, M. J. (2014). Global analysis of protein aggregation in yeast during physiological conditions and arsenite stress. Biology open, 3(10), 913-923. doi: 10.1242/bio.20148938 | ||
+ | #PubMed Abstract: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Global+analysis+of+protein+aggregation+in+yeast+during+physiological+conditions+and+arsenite+stress | ||
+ | #PubMed Central: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197440/ | ||
+ | #Publisher Full Text (HTML): https://bio.biologists.org/content/3/10/913.short | ||
+ | #Publisher Full Text (PDF): https://bio.biologists.org/content/biolopen/3/10/913.full.pdf | ||
+ | #Copyright:2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd (information found on PDF version of article) | ||
+ | #Article is Open Access. | ||
+ | #Article is available only online. The journal website allows for a subscription, but only for access to online content. | ||
+ | #Publisher: The Company of Biologists Ltd (scientific society), non-profit, OAPA member, United Kingdom | ||
+ | #The journal began in 2012. | ||
+ | #The articles in the journal are peer-reviewed. | ||
+ | #Editors and Board: https://bio.biologists.org/content/edboard | ||
+ | #Journal Impact Factor: 1.962 | ||
+ | #The article is a |
Revision as of 15:40, 12 November 2019
Definitions
Article Outline
- What is the main result presented in this paper?
- What is the importance or significance of this work?
- What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work?
- How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?)
- What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid?
- What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long?
- What controls did they use?
- How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint?
- What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray?
- What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data?
- Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site?
- Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.
- What do the X and Y axes represent?
- How were the measurements made?
- What trends are shown by the plots and what conclusions can you draw from the data?
- How does this work compare with previous studies?
- What are the important implications of this work?
- What future directions should the authors take?
- Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?
Annotated Bibliography
- Ibstedt, S., Sideri, T. C., Grant, C. M., & Tamás, M. J. (2014). Global analysis of protein aggregation in yeast during physiological conditions and arsenite stress. Biology open, 3(10), 913-923. doi: 10.1242/bio.20148938
- PubMed Abstract: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Global+analysis+of+protein+aggregation+in+yeast+during+physiological+conditions+and+arsenite+stress
- PubMed Central: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197440/
- Publisher Full Text (HTML): https://bio.biologists.org/content/3/10/913.short
- Publisher Full Text (PDF): https://bio.biologists.org/content/biolopen/3/10/913.full.pdf
- Copyright:2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd (information found on PDF version of article)
- Article is Open Access.
- Article is available only online. The journal website allows for a subscription, but only for access to online content.
- Publisher: The Company of Biologists Ltd (scientific society), non-profit, OAPA member, United Kingdom
- The journal began in 2012.
- The articles in the journal are peer-reviewed.
- Editors and Board: https://bio.biologists.org/content/edboard
- Journal Impact Factor: 1.962
- The article is a