Class Journal Week 1 - Revision history

Kmill104: /* Katie Miller */ adding my signature

2024-01-25T22:05:33Z

‎Katie Miller: adding my signature

Kmill104: /* Hailey */ deleting my user page link

2024-01-25T22:04:21Z

‎Hailey: deleting my user page link

Hivanson: /* After reading the Denning articles and the Janovy chapter, answer the following questions: */ fixed bullet point question/answer

2024-01-19T01:28:35Z

‎After reading the Denning articles and the Janovy chapter, answer the following questions:: fixed bullet point question/answer

Hivanson: /* Before reading the Denning articles (on your honor), answer the following questions: */ fixed bullet point question/answer

2024-01-19T01:27:51Z

‎Before reading the Denning articles (on your honor), answer the following questions:: fixed bullet point question/answer

Ckapla12: editing journal

2024-01-19T00:00:52Z

editing journal

Ckapla12 at 23:06, 18 January 2024

2024-01-18T23:06:59Z

Ckapla12: journal week 1

2024-01-18T23:06:21Z

journal week 1

Hivanson: /* Hailey */ fixed 2 small typos

2024-01-18T22:33:29Z

‎Hailey: fixed 2 small typos

Hivanson: /* Hailey */ added link to my page on my journal

2024-01-18T22:25:22Z

‎Hailey: added link to my page on my journal

Hivanson: /* After reading the Denning articles and the Janovy chapter, answer the following questions: */ added space before signature

2024-01-18T22:24:16Z

‎After reading the Denning articles and the Janovy chapter, answer the following questions:: added space before signature

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 25 January 2024
Line 104:		Line 104:
	#To be a biologist, you must consider your values, rather than what you do. It is one thing to have a job that is related or even unrelated to biology, but it is another to have the values of a biologist. Biologists have a unique worldview, where they see everything in the context of biological concepts or processes. They are different from other professions, who view things in the context of primarily human activity and what we do. Biologists study nature and see humans as a late-stage competitor for our world’s resources. To be a biologist, you must have an attachment to all living organisms, not just humans. Biologists must ask questions about the biosphere, and they must be open to potential investigations for everyday observations. They must also recognize both the complexity and uniformity that is present within organisms. Similarly, they must see the many types of relationships that exist between organisms and how environments are based on interdependency. And though there are many tools that can be used in the field of biology, these tools are not what make a biologist. We can use different fields of science or even the humanities to learn more about a subject, but a true biologist will be able to use these tools and then apply them based off of your own observations and understanding of the world. In some ways I would consider myself a biologist, because I feel that I do see the world as a biologist should and have an interest in all organisms. But I am still working towards being able to come up with the right questions and to apply my observations, specifically in an experimental context		#To be a biologist, you must consider your values, rather than what you do. It is one thing to have a job that is related or even unrelated to biology, but it is another to have the values of a biologist. Biologists have a unique worldview, where they see everything in the context of biological concepts or processes. They are different from other professions, who view things in the context of primarily human activity and what we do. Biologists study nature and see humans as a late-stage competitor for our world’s resources. To be a biologist, you must have an attachment to all living organisms, not just humans. Biologists must ask questions about the biosphere, and they must be open to potential investigations for everyday observations. They must also recognize both the complexity and uniformity that is present within organisms. Similarly, they must see the many types of relationships that exist between organisms and how environments are based on interdependency. And though there are many tools that can be used in the field of biology, these tools are not what make a biologist. We can use different fields of science or even the humanities to learn more about a subject, but a true biologist will be able to use these tools and then apply them based off of your own observations and understanding of the world. In some ways I would consider myself a biologist, because I feel that I do see the world as a biologist should and have an interest in all organisms. But I am still working towards being able to come up with the right questions and to apply my observations, specifically in an experimental context

		+	[[User:Kmill104\|Kmill104]] ([[User talk:Kmill104\|talk]]) 14:05, 25 January 2024 (PST)

	== Charlotte Kaplan ==		== Charlotte Kaplan ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 25 January 2024
Line 67:		Line 67:
	[[User:Hivanson\|Hivanson]] ([[User talk:Hivanson\|talk]]) 14:23, 18 January 2024 (PST)		[[User:Hivanson\|Hivanson]] ([[User talk:Hivanson\|talk]]) 14:23, 18 January 2024 (PST)

−	~~[[Kmill104 Week 1 Shared Journal Entry]]~~

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 computing, and biology as fields of study, and serve to broaden our view of the topics,
 especially if we are unfamiliar with them (like myself with computer science).
-*Which of the voices in the Voices of Computing article seem to appeal to you
+*Which of the voices in the Voices of Computing article seem to appeal to you the most?
 The Mathematician appealed to me the most because I never really associated mathematicians with
 computer science. Though, I suppose I knew about the math required for “computation,” and that
@@ Line 51: / Line 50: @@
 about how I think about computer science as a discipline and how many kinds of skills are involved.
 *Apply one of the seven principles from the Computing is a Natural Science
-article to something as "non-computer-science"-y as possible, either from
+article to something as "non-computer-science"-y as possible, either from other subjects or your daily life.
 Hierarchical Aggregation (Design) could easily be applied to many non-computer science-y things.
 Taxonomic ranking matches the description “Larger entities are composed
@@ Line 61: / Line 59: @@
 a whole new way of viewing the world, and that most if not all biologists tend to see things in the
 same or similar ways, just due to their field of study.
-*What does it mean to be a biologist? Do you consider yourself a biologist?
+*What does it mean to be a biologist? Do you consider yourself a biologist? Why or why not?
 Janovy considers being a biologist to take on the shared values of biologists. I believe in the
 “common bond” and worth of understanding life as Janovy discussed on page 2, and my metaphors

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *When you hear the term computer science, what comes to mind?
 Programming/writing code, artificial intelligence, and flashbacks from UCode coding classes
-when I was in middle school. #When older relatives or friends hear the term computer science, what do you
+when I was in middle school.
-think comes to their minds?
+*When older relatives or friends hear the term computer science, what do you think comes to their minds?
-*Depending on how much older or what they hear on the news, answers vary. Some older
+Depending on how much older or what they hear on the news, answers vary. Some older
 friends or relatives of mine would likely first think of how scary artificial intelligence is and
 how it’s going to steal away everyone’s jobs and make everything impersonal and dystopian.
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 making my own mods for Minecraft, and I know my friends' younger siblings are or at least
 were the same way.
 ===Before reading the Janovy chapter (on your honor), answer the following questions:===
 *When you hear the term biology, what comes to mind?

@@ Line 111: / Line 111: @@
 Denning:
 When I hear the term computer science I think of coding, AI, and new technology.
   Older relatives think of computer science as scary, such as the fears of AI.
-       Younger relatives want to get involved in computer science and the rise of AI
+*When older relatives or friends hear the term computer science, what do you think comes to their minds?
 Janovy:
 I would not consider myself a biologist because I haven’t been involved in research, however I love biology and hope to call myself one one day.
 The two readings intertwine computer science and biology, highlighting the similarities and differences between the two. They show how both these fields play a huge role in daily life.
 After:
 In Voices of Computer Science, User is most appealing due to the many functions of my computer I rely on every day, for school, work, and communications.
 Applying one of the seven principles, computation can be applied to my daily life when I schedule my time out for each sat. I have to add and subtract time when planning my daily schedule to ensure I have ample time to complete responsibilities.
 Janovy’s reading was interesting in the sense that he showed how biologists and scientists critically think similarly. He showed that the conventional definition for biologist can be interpreted differently.
 Before reading, I did not consider myself a biologist because I had not. been involved in projects yet.After reading, I would consider myself a biologist because of my interest and passion for discovering and learning about the field.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 18 January 2024
Line 106:		Line 106:
	#I found most interesting the emphasis on naturalism, and how Janovy considered an interest in naturalism to be fundamental for a career in biology. He noticed that in all his mentors, they somehow followed the naturalist tradition even if they were unaware of it. To be a successful biologist, one must have an interest in all organisms and their natural origin. I was also interested in his belief that biologists should hold a worldview where they see everything in the context of biology, which led me to realize that I had often been doing so, even if I wasn’t aware of it.		#I found most interesting the emphasis on naturalism, and how Janovy considered an interest in naturalism to be fundamental for a career in biology. He noticed that in all his mentors, they somehow followed the naturalist tradition even if they were unaware of it. To be a successful biologist, one must have an interest in all organisms and their natural origin. I was also interested in his belief that biologists should hold a worldview where they see everything in the context of biology, which led me to realize that I had often been doing so, even if I wasn’t aware of it.
	#To be a biologist, you must consider your values, rather than what you do. It is one thing to have a job that is related or even unrelated to biology, but it is another to have the values of a biologist. Biologists have a unique worldview, where they see everything in the context of biological concepts or processes. They are different from other professions, who view things in the context of primarily human activity and what we do. Biologists study nature and see humans as a late-stage competitor for our world’s resources. To be a biologist, you must have an attachment to all living organisms, not just humans. Biologists must ask questions about the biosphere, and they must be open to potential investigations for everyday observations. They must also recognize both the complexity and uniformity that is present within organisms. Similarly, they must see the many types of relationships that exist between organisms and how environments are based on interdependency. And though there are many tools that can be used in the field of biology, these tools are not what make a biologist. We can use different fields of science or even the humanities to learn more about a subject, but a true biologist will be able to use these tools and then apply them based off of your own observations and understanding of the world. In some ways I would consider myself a biologist, because I feel that I do see the world as a biologist should and have an interest in all organisms. But I am still working towards being able to come up with the right questions and to apply my observations, specifically in an experimental context		#To be a biologist, you must consider your values, rather than what you do. It is one thing to have a job that is related or even unrelated to biology, but it is another to have the values of a biologist. Biologists have a unique worldview, where they see everything in the context of biological concepts or processes. They are different from other professions, who view things in the context of primarily human activity and what we do. Biologists study nature and see humans as a late-stage competitor for our world’s resources. To be a biologist, you must have an attachment to all living organisms, not just humans. Biologists must ask questions about the biosphere, and they must be open to potential investigations for everyday observations. They must also recognize both the complexity and uniformity that is present within organisms. Similarly, they must see the many types of relationships that exist between organisms and how environments are based on interdependency. And though there are many tools that can be used in the field of biology, these tools are not what make a biologist. We can use different fields of science or even the humanities to learn more about a subject, but a true biologist will be able to use these tools and then apply them based off of your own observations and understanding of the world. In some ways I would consider myself a biologist, because I feel that I do see the world as a biologist should and have an interest in all organisms. But I am still working towards being able to come up with the right questions and to apply my observations, specifically in an experimental context
		+
		+
		+	== Charlotte Kaplan ==
		+	Denning:
		+	When I hear the term computer science I think of coding, AI, and new technology.
		+	Older relatives think of computer science as scary, such as the fears of AI.
		+	3. Younger relatives want to get involved in.computer science and the rise of AI
		+
		+	Janovy:
		+	I would not consider myself a biologist because I haven’t been involved in research, however I love biology and hope to call myself one one day.
		+	The two readings intertwine computer science and biology, highlighting the similarities and differences between the two. They show how both these fields play a huge role in daily life.
		+
		+	After:
		+	In Voices of Computer Science, User is most appealing due to the many functions of my computer I rely on every day, for school, work, and communications.
		+	Applying one of the seven principles, computation can be applied to my daily life when I schedule my time out for each sat. I have to add and subtract time when planning my daily schedule to ensure I have ample time to complete responsibilities.
		+	Janovy’s reading was interesting in the sense that he showed how biologists and scientists critically think similarly. He showed that the conventional definition for biologist can be interpreted differently.
		+	Before reading, I did not consider myself a biologist because I had not. been involved in projects yet.After reading, I would consider myself a biologist because of my interest and passion for discovering and learning about the field.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Template:Andrew and Dean Journal 1}}
-==Hailey==
+==[[user:Hivanson|Hailey]]==
 ===Before reading the Denning articles (on your honor), answer the following questions:===
 *When you hear the term computer science, what comes to mind?

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 always end up biology-themed as discussed on page 20; I believe in Janovy’s definition, I could
 consider myself a biologist.
 [[User:Hivanson|Hivanson]] ([[User talk:Hivanson|talk]]) 14:23, 18 January 2024 (PST)