User talk:Kmill104

Week 2 Feedback

• Thank you for submitting your work on time!
• All of the requested navigation links were present and you invoked your template on your individual journal page.
• During the period of review, you made 35 edits to the wiki and wrote something in the summary field 100% of the time. Excellent--keep up the good work!
• All of the requested tasks were completed appropriately, except for the following:
  • Electronic Lab Notebook
    • While your purpose gives a general overview of the lab exercise, it is not specific enough. Your team was tasked with creating a purple protein and this should have been stated in the purpose.
    • Your methods/results section summarizes what you did instead of giving a step-by-step of exactly what you did. You needed to mention that you followed the handout instructions and cite it. Some additional screenshots to illustrate some of the other protein folds would have been welcome.
    • You answered all of the questions correctly.
    • Again, your conclusion is general, it could be more specific about achieving a purple protein.
  • Don't forget to sign the Academic Honesty statement in the acknowledgments section with your wiki signature.
  • In your references section, make sure to cite the lab exercise handout. The references for your reflection should go on your individual page instead of the class journal page.
• One of the reasons that synonymous codons can affect gene expression is due to the efficiency of translation. Some synonymous codons for the same amino acid are more common than others and have a greater abundance of tRNAs for those particular codons. If a tRNA is rarer, it can slow the efficiency or even pause translation on the ribosome. This can then affect the expression of the protein from that gene.

— Kdahlquist (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2024 (PST)

Week 1 Feedback

• Thank you for submitting your assignment on time!
• All of the tasks from the assignment were complete, except for the following which were incomplete or could show some improvement. You will be able to earn back points that you lost by making these corrections by the deadline for the Week 3 assignment.
  • You wrote something in the summary field for 34/40 (85%) of edits during the period of review. This is pretty good, but remember we are aiming for 100%.
  • You provided an external link on your user page, but instead of just pasting in the URL, please use the syntax that will give your link a visible label. I.e., instead of just https://www.lmu.edu do [https://www.lmu.edu LMU home page], which will look like this: LMU home page.
  • Similarly, you can use a label to make your link to your file look nicer. Instead of [[Media:Kmill104Resume2.docx]], do [[Media:Kmill104Resume2.docx | My resume]].
  • You had two levels of headings on your page, please include the "====" level as well.
  • Please include the following statement in your Acknowledgments section and sign with your wiki signature:
    • Except for what is noted above, this individual journal entry was completed by me and not copied from another source.
  • Please also sign your shared journal entry with your wiki signature.
• I'm glad that the readings expanded your ideas about what biology and computer science encompass!

— Kdahlquist (talk) 13:12, 25 January 2024 (PST)