Difference between revisions of "Hivanson Week 12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Questions about your article: fixed bullet point) |
(→Questions about your article: why significant work) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
#*CHP exposure changes the transcriptional response of yeast via its oxidative stress response. The researchers observed the changes in yeast transcription from minutes 0-20, noting many significant changes in minutes 0-6. | #*CHP exposure changes the transcriptional response of yeast via its oxidative stress response. The researchers observed the changes in yeast transcription from minutes 0-20, noting many significant changes in minutes 0-6. | ||
#**Implicated pathways include oxidative phosphorylation, galactose metabolism, ATP synthesis, proteasome proteolysis, and glutathione & thioredoxin systems. | #**Implicated pathways include oxidative phosphorylation, galactose metabolism, ATP synthesis, proteasome proteolysis, and glutathione & thioredoxin systems. | ||
| − | |||
# What is the importance or significance of this work? | # What is the importance or significance of this work? | ||
| + | #*This paper was the first to note the early (0-6 minutes post-exposure) transcriptional response by yeast to CHP. | ||
| + | #*The researchers found that ''Yap3'', ''5'', and ''7'' are involved in the yeast OSR, and that their functions were not previously known. | ||
# What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work? | # What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work? | ||
# How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?) | # How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?) | ||
Revision as of 09:46, 16 April 2024
Contents
Presentation Prep
Defining 10 unknown biological terms
Questions about your article
- What is the main result presented in this paper?
- CHP exposure changes the transcriptional response of yeast via its oxidative stress response. The researchers observed the changes in yeast transcription from minutes 0-20, noting many significant changes in minutes 0-6.
- Implicated pathways include oxidative phosphorylation, galactose metabolism, ATP synthesis, proteasome proteolysis, and glutathione & thioredoxin systems.
- CHP exposure changes the transcriptional response of yeast via its oxidative stress response. The researchers observed the changes in yeast transcription from minutes 0-20, noting many significant changes in minutes 0-6.
- What is the importance or significance of this work?
- This paper was the first to note the early (0-6 minutes post-exposure) transcriptional response by yeast to CHP.
- The researchers found that Yap3, 5, and 7 are involved in the yeast OSR, and that their functions were not previously known.
- What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work?
- How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?)
- What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid?
- What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long?
- What controls did they use?
- How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint?
- What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray?
- What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data?
- Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site?
- Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.
- What do the X and Y axes represent (if applicable)?
- How were the measurements made?
- What trends are shown by the plots and what conclusions can you draw from the data?
- How does this work compare with previous studies?
- What are the important implications of this work?
- What future directions should the authors take?
- Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?
Presentation
Ivanson, Kaplan, Miller on Sha et al., 2013
