Difference between revisions of "Alina's Assessment and Reflection"
From LMU BioDB 2013
(→Statement of Work: ID investigation) |
(→Assessment of Project: began assessment questions) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== Assessment of Project == | == Assessment of Project == | ||
| − | * Give an objective assessment of the success of your project workflow and teamwork. | + | * Give an objective assessment of the success of your project workflow and teamwork. |
| + | * As a group we were very successful when it came to completing tasks and working together as a team. | ||
* What worked and what didn't work? | * What worked and what didn't work? | ||
* What would you do differently if you could do it all over again? | * What would you do differently if you could do it all over again? | ||
Revision as of 22:38, 13 December 2013
Contents |
Statement of Work
Identification of Gene IDs
- Used Microsoft Access to investigate files of original 3 strains (TIGR4, R6, G54)
- Identified/checked gene ID formats for consistency and looked for orderedlocus totals
- Format/total for TIGR4 strain of interest were as follows:
- TIGR4: SP_#### Orderedlocus: 2126
Updating of Gene Database Testing Reports
- Was responsible for running counts (XMLPipeDB Match, Tally Engine, SQL)for all export testing reports
- Performed visual inspections within gdb files
- Systems table
- UniProt table
- RefSeq table
- OriginalRowCounts
- Used snipping tool to provide screenshots for most results in testing
- (Did not update GenMAPP aspects, left to Kevin)
- Compared found Gene ID formats with corresponding online resources (UniProt, RefSeq)
- Investigated Ensembl (MOD) to compare gene totals
- Export Reports contributed to:
Electronic Notebooks: Week12 Week13 Week14 Week15
XML/Exception File Comparison
- Used XMLPipeDB Match in order to search Uniprot XML file for species IDs with format SP_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] and got 2126 results.
- This was saved as a text file in order to make compatible for Excel. This file and exceptions file were put in adjacent columns and Excel match function was used. All results found to be #N/A.
- Excel File: ID Comparison
Visual Representation of Data Information
- Helped Kevin with visual representating replicate information from microarray paper
- Used Paint program to create diagram
- Provide references or links to artifacts of your work, such as:
- Wiki pages
- Other files or documents
- Code or scripts
Assessment of Project
- Give an objective assessment of the success of your project workflow and teamwork.
- As a group we were very successful when it came to completing tasks and working together as a team.
- What worked and what didn't work?
- What would you do differently if you could do it all over again?
- Evaluate the Gene Database Project and Group Report in the following areas:
- Content: What is the quality of the work?
- Organization: Comment on the organization of the project and of your group's wiki pages.
- Completeness: Did your team achieve all of the project objectives? Why or why not?
Reflection on the Process
- What did you learn?
- With your head (biological or computer science principles)
- With your heart (personal qualities and teamwork qualities that make things work or not work)?
- With your hands (technical skills)?
- What lesson will you take away from this project that you will still use a year from now?
