Difference between revisions of "Page Desiigner"

From LMU BioDB 2017
Jump to: navigation, search
(added new summary Nicole)
(added answersNicole)
Line 176: Line 176:
  
 
====Nicole====
 
====Nicole====
 +
#What Worked?
 +
#*Arash and I communicated via text and had a better idea of what we needed to do earlier on in the week, which made it easier to progress and do quality, time efficient work.
 +
#What didn't work?
 +
#*We weren't all able to meet in person. I don't know if this was a huge issue this week, but scheduling conflicts might become more of a problem in December.
 +
#What will I do next week to fix what didn't work?
 +
#*Next week I will try to make plans with the group on Tuesday. I am assuming everyone is going out of town for Thanksgiving, but perhaps we can make certain dates within the week to have things done by so the rest of the group can look over the work.
  
 
====Hayden====
 
====Hayden====

Revision as of 07:48, 21 November 2017



Page Design Team Members

Coder: Arash Lari
Project Manager/ Quality Assurance: Hayden Hinsch
Data Analyst: Mary Balducci
Designer: Nicole Kalcic

Team Schedule

Page Desiigner Schedule

Page Desiigner Uploaded Files

Media:MaryHaydenWeek12JournalClubPresentation.pptx ‎
File:Data Driven Design.zip



Annotated Bibliography

Mary's contribution:

Pizzaro, Jewett, Nielson, Agosin. (2008) Growth Temperature Exerts Differential Physiological and Transcriptional Responses in Laboratory and Wine Strains of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. "Applied and Environmental Microbiology", 74, 6358-6368, doi:10.1128/AEM.00602-08


Homma, Iwahashi, Komatsu. (2003) Yeast Gene Expression During Growth at Low Temperature. Cryobiology, 46, doi: 10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00028-2

Hayden's Contribution

Dahlquist, K. D., Fitzpatrick, B. G., Camacho, E. T., Entzminger, S. D., & Wanner, N. C. (2015). Parameter Estimation for Gene Regulatory Networks from Microarray Data: Cold Shock Response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 77(8), 1457–1492. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-015-0092-6


Ando, A., Nakamura, T., Murata, Y., Takagi, H. and Shima, J. (2007), Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to freeze–thaw stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains. FEMS Yeast Research, 7: 244–253. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00162.x



Journal Club Presentations

Powerpoint Slides and Respective Articles

File:Data Driven Design.zip


Media:MaryHaydenWeek12JournalClubPresentation.pptx ‎

  • Pizzaro, Jewett, Nielson, Agosin. (2008) Growth Temperature Exerts Differential Physiological and Transcriptional Responses in Laboratory and Wine Strains of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. "Applied and Environmental Microbiology", 74, 6358-6368, doi:10.1128/AEM.00602-08

Executive Summaries

Week 11 Executive Summaries

Arash

This week, I worked on researching the given article and the development terms within it as well as prepare a presentation on the article. I also began thinking of some page layout ideas with Nicole to prepare to implement in the coming weeks. All of this information could be found on my Week 11 page: ArashLari Week 11. ArashLari (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2017 (PST)

Mary

This week, I worked on creating an annotated bibliography. The articles I found were primary sources about experiments done involving cold shock on yeast, and the use of microarrays to show results. I used multiple databases to find these articles, and while doing so I learned what key words got me the results closest to what I wanted. While writing the annotated bibliography, I also learned more about the articles, such as when they were written, who published them, what kind of publisher they are, and other information. All of this is recorded in my Week 11 page.

Mbalducc (talk) 23:03, 13 November 2017 (PST)

Nicole

This past week, I read the article The Data-Driven Design Era in Professional Web Design by L.A. Liikkanen. This allowed me to complete my individual journal: an informative outline of the article and list of ten definitions. Arash and I worked together to complete a 15 minute presentation that we are going to give on Tuesday. The presentation gives an overview of our individual journals and what we each learned. You can access more information on what I did this week here: Nicolekalcic Week 11. Nicolekalcic (talk) 01:27, 14 November 2017 (PST)

Hayden

This week I created part of the annotated bibliography we will be using for our final project. I conducted searched for "yeast cold shock microarray" articles and found which two articles I was going to use for the bibliography. The majority of the time this week was spent on finding the information needed for the annotated bibliography which can be found below on this page. More detailed information can be found on my hhinsch Week 11 page. This week I became proficient in finding reliable article to use for our final project. This week we also created the group's template and wiki page. Hhinsch (talk) 22:43, 13 November 2017 (PST)

Week 12 Executive Summaries

Arash

This week was rather light compared to the previous week. We mostly set up the files on our personal computers, which was convenient because as a computer science major I already had most of the necessary files. Nicole and I talked about some preliminary designs and set up a rough schedule that we'll make concrete after the break. This can be found on my week 12 page [[ArashLari Week 12] | Arash Lari Week 12]. ArashLari (talk) 20:43, 20 November 2017 (PST)

Mary

This week I read an article about an experiment done on wine and lab strains of yeast in different temperatures. The experimenters used DNA microarrays to determine which genes were affected by the change in temperatures and which were different based on the different strains of yeast. While reading the article, I can across words I had never seen before, so I also found and recorded the definitions of these words. I then made an outline of the article, to use as a basis for my presentation with our project manager, Hayden. All of this is on my Week 12 page.

Mbalducc (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2017 (PST)

Nicole

Because Arash and I presented last week, we didn't have a heavy work load this week. Arash explained a lot of technical things to me, and we completed the first coding milestones and talked about design possibilities. I officially have a GitHub (nicolekal). I also downloaded the software I needed but didn't have onto my laptop. A full update can be found on: [[Nicolekalcic Week 12] | Nicole Kalcic Week 12]. Nicolekalcic (talk) 23:45, 20 November 2017 (PST)

Hayden

This week I worked with Mary specifically in order to complete our journal club presentation. As a group we worked together to make corrections to the Page Desiigner group page in order to complete the deliverables for this week. Mary and I created a schedule for our group along with helpful links. As a class we decided we will be using WhatsApp to communicate. I spent most of this week outlining the article (it was a pretty difficult read) and defining terms on my hhinsch Week 12 page. Hhinsch (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2017 (PST)

Team Progress Reflections

Week 11 Team Progress Reflections

Nicole

  1. What worked?
    • We all work well in our positions. Arash and I worked together recently, so it was easy to coordinate what we are going to do as coder and designer. Everyone was open to opinions on the page and team name. Also, everyone communicated what they were having trouble finishing.
  2. What didn't work?
    • Like Mary said, we weren't able to meet in person. We planned out our meetup during class, but Friday ended up being a busy day for everyone.
  3. What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    • Next week I will make sure to check in more with my partners. Even if we don't meet up, it is important to make sure everyone is caught up on the assignment and their individual parts.

Mary

  1. What worked?
    • I think as a team, we did a good job communicating and figuring out what needed to be done, and who would do each part.
  2. What didn't work?
    • We did not meet up outside of class. We had planned to, but we all ended up having conflicts so we couldn't meet.
  3. What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    • I think this can be fixed just by making sure we all communicate in other ways, which is what we did. Through text messages we were able to talk about the assignment and help each other.

Hayden

  1. What worked?
    • We are all doing well communicating and completing our deliverables as individuals and as a group.
  2. What didn't work?
    • Everything worked well in regards to the group, but I did have some trouble finding all the information needed to create an annotated bibliography for the articles I used. Google Scholar gave me way too many results, and PubMed did not have a lot of articles that were either free or LMU had paid for.
  3. What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    • I will continue to ask questions in class. I also feel more confident about finding useful articles after the completion of this assignment, so it shouldn't be a problem.

Hhinsch (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2017 (PST)

Arash

  1. What worked?
    • We were good at maintaining our own individual tasks and keeping each other updated via text message.
  1. What didn't work?
    • We were unable to schedule time to meet and work effectively.
  1. What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    • Hopefully we will have lighter course loads and more free time for the next assignment, but besides that we will begin working sooner and try to work in person more than digitally.


Week 12 Team Progress Reflections

Arash

  1. What worked?
    • I think we all got a better grasp of the assignment and time management for the assignment. We have a clear idea where we're headed.
  2. What didn't work?
    • I wish we had more time to dedicate to this class, as often our schedules don't line up.
  3. What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    • We'll try to be more proactive about all our tasks so they don't pile up. I'm planning on starting some work during the thanksgiving break to lighten the load afterwards.

Mary

  1. What worked?
    • I think that this week I felt more comfortable with the project as a whole. I also liked presenting after the other guilds because I got to see their presentations to get a better idea of what we should include in ours.
  2. What didn't work?
    • I wish that I had more time to read the article and make the presentation. I felt that I didn't understand the article completely, and had to read it a few times to be happy with the way that I understood it and formed my outline of it. Because of this, I couldn't spend as much time as I would've wanted on making the presentation.
  3. What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    • I will try to spend more time on the entire project, instead of just one part.

Nicole

  1. What Worked?
    • Arash and I communicated via text and had a better idea of what we needed to do earlier on in the week, which made it easier to progress and do quality, time efficient work.
  2. What didn't work?
    • We weren't all able to meet in person. I don't know if this was a huge issue this week, but scheduling conflicts might become more of a problem in December.
  3. What will I do next week to fix what didn't work?
    • Next week I will try to make plans with the group on Tuesday. I am assuming everyone is going out of town for Thanksgiving, but perhaps we can make certain dates within the week to have things done by so the rest of the group can look over the work.

Hayden

  1. What Worked?
    • This week we were a little more prepared to work together and complete the deliverables. As time goes by the end goal is becoming more apparent.
  2. What didn't work?
    • I spent a lot of time reading the article multiple times and it is still a bit confusing to me. A lot of the vocabulary wasn't even found in the dictionaries we provided and a lot of the information needed a lot of background knowledge to comprehend.
  3. What will I do next week to fix what didn't work?
    • Next week I will try and do the bulk of the assignment earlier in the week rather than on the weekend, so I may have more time to understand the material.Hhinsch (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2017 (PST)
GRNsight Gene Page Project Links
Overview Deliverables Reference Format Guilds Project Manager Quality Assurance Data Analysis Coder
Teams Page Desiigner Lights, Camera, InterACTION! Gene hAPI JASPAR the Friendly Ghost

Page Desiigner Deliverables Page

Page Desiigner Deliverables Page

Page Desiigner Schedule

Page Desiigner Schedule

Uploaded Files

File:Data Driven Design.zip
File:MaryHaydenWeek12JournalClubPresentation.pptx
File:BiodbPageDesignFinalPresentation .pptx
File:PageDesignREADME.txt

Individual Contributer Pages

Arash Lari
Hayden Hinsch
Mary Balducci
Nicole Kalcic