User talk:Msamdars

During Week 1, I have created my talk page. Msamdars (talk) 13:52, 3 September 2019 (PDT)

Feedback on Week 1 Assignment

I am posting the feedback on your Week 1 assignment here.

• All of the items listed in the assignment were completed except for the following items noted below. You have the opportunity to make up the points you lost on your assignment by making the requested changes by the Week 3 assignment deadline.
  • What are your career interests and goals?
  • You wrote something in the summary field 31 out of 118 times (26%). The number of saves tells me that you are saving incrementally, early, and often, which is great. However we are aiming to write something in the summary field 100% of the time, so you have some room to improve on that.
  • By convention, we don't use the single "=" for a header because that level is reserved for the top of the page. Please start at the double "==" instead.
  • In your Acknowledgments section, please acknowledge your partner.
• Janovy is definitely coming from the naturalist tradition in biology. It's interesting to think about how one could be a naturalist, but focused on molecular biology.

— Kdahlquist (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2019 (PDT)

Feedback on Week 5 Database Page

I am posting feedback on your Week 5 Database page here.

• Thank you for submitting your assignment on time.
• You completed all of the requested items except for the following:
  • When creating a link to download a file, please use the syntax [[Media:filename | visible label]] instead of [[File:filename | visible label]]. The latter does not create a direct download link, but takes you to a secondary page.
  • Was the database curated electronically or by humans? If by humans, was it by staff or community? Your answer was not explicit on these points and only directed the reader to the database website.
  • Is the database larger or small? Public or private? Again, you were not explicit in your answers to these questions.
  • You provide in text citations in the form of links to about half of your answers.
  • Please provide the DOI for articles listed in your References section.
• Your shared journal response was missing for this week.

— Kdahlquist (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2019 (PDT)

Week 1 Redux Feedback

• You completed all of the corrections requested for the Week 1 assignment.
• In the period from September 12 to 19 you made 27 edits to the wiki and wrote something in the summary field 25 times (93%), a big improvement from Week 1's 26%!

— Kdahlquist (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2019 (PDT)

Week 8 Interim Feedback

• I checked the workbook you uploaded for the interim Week 8 assignment.
• It appears that all of your computations are correct.
• It would have been preferable to copy over all of the individual replicate data to the "dCIN5_ANOVA" worksheet, instead of just writing formulas with references to the master sheet, so that all the data is in one table.

— Kdahlquist (talk) 12:31, 22 October 2019 (PDT)

Week 10 Interim Feedback

• I can see that you did not try to check your input workbook by uploading it to GRNsight. Give it a try and troubleshoot your results. :)

— Kdahlquist (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2019 (PST)