Difference between revisions of "Mavila9 Week 8"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(purpose, methods & results, and data sections) |
(→Conclusion: explanation) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Conclusion == | == Conclusion == | ||
− | + | In conclusion, the wild type p-values were calculated for each gene allowing statistical significance to be determined. Next Bonferroni and Benjamini & Hochberg p-value adjustments were done to correct for the multiple testing problem. | |
== Acknowledgements == | == Acknowledgements == |
Revision as of 14:24, 20 October 2019
Links
Purpose
This investigation was done to analyze the data of the life cycle for a DNA microarray dataset and develop knowledge about what different p-value cut-offs mean.
Methods & Results
- Steps were followed according to the "Calculate the Bonferroni and p value Correction" and "Calculate the Benjamini & Hochberg p value Correction" sections of the Week 8 assignment page
- The sanity check in step 22 of "Statistical Analysis Part 1: ANOVA" showed that 2528 out of the 6189 samples have a p-value of less than 0.05
Data
File:BIOL367 F19 microarray-data wtMAVILA9 Benjamini&Hochberg Pvalue Correction.zip
Conclusion
In conclusion, the wild type p-values were calculated for each gene allowing statistical significance to be determined. Next Bonferroni and Benjamini & Hochberg p-value adjustments were done to correct for the multiple testing problem.