Difference between revisions of "Mavila9 Week 8"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Conclusion: explanation) |
(→Acknowledgements: acknowledgements) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Acknowledgements == | == Acknowledgements == | ||
− | + | I'd like to thank [[User:Knguye66]], [[User:Jcowan4]], and [[User:Cdomin12]] for helping with this investigation. Except for what is noted above, this individual journal entry was completed by me and not copied from another source. | |
+ | [[User:Mavila9|Mavila9]] ([[User talk:Mavila9|talk]]) 14:24, 20 October 2019 (PDT) | ||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 14:24, 20 October 2019
Links
Purpose
This investigation was done to analyze the data of the life cycle for a DNA microarray dataset and develop knowledge about what different p-value cut-offs mean.
Methods & Results
- Steps were followed according to the "Calculate the Bonferroni and p value Correction" and "Calculate the Benjamini & Hochberg p value Correction" sections of the Week 8 assignment page
- The sanity check in step 22 of "Statistical Analysis Part 1: ANOVA" showed that 2528 out of the 6189 samples have a p-value of less than 0.05
Data
File:BIOL367 F19 microarray-data wtMAVILA9 Benjamini&Hochberg Pvalue Correction.zip
Conclusion
In conclusion, the wild type p-values were calculated for each gene allowing statistical significance to be determined. Next Bonferroni and Benjamini & Hochberg p-value adjustments were done to correct for the multiple testing problem.
Acknowledgements
I'd like to thank User:Knguye66, User:Jcowan4, and User:Cdomin12 for helping with this investigation. Except for what is noted above, this individual journal entry was completed by me and not copied from another source. Mavila9 (talk) 14:24, 20 October 2019 (PDT)