Difference between revisions of "Mavila9 Week 12 Journal"
(→Article Outline) |
(→Article Outline: answers) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#* This paper's main result was that cells responded to cellular arsenite acquisition by stimulating sulfur assimilation or glutathione biosynthesis pathways through the control of transcription factors Yap1p and Met4p. These results are found by transcriptome, proteome, and sulfur metabolite profiling of ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae's'' response to arsenite. | #* This paper's main result was that cells responded to cellular arsenite acquisition by stimulating sulfur assimilation or glutathione biosynthesis pathways through the control of transcription factors Yap1p and Met4p. These results are found by transcriptome, proteome, and sulfur metabolite profiling of ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae's'' response to arsenite. | ||
# What is the importance or significance of this work? | # What is the importance or significance of this work? | ||
− | #* | + | #* This work provides further information about the impact of arsenite on the environmental and human health. Due to its causative and curative properties for disease a more full understanding of global and specific responses can help development of medical therapies. |
# What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work? | # What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work? | ||
+ | #* Previous studies have not shown whether protein glutothionylation occurs in response to metals or not. | ||
# How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?) | # How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?) | ||
+ | #* Metal sensitivity assays using sodium arsenite, cadmium chloride, and potassium antimonyl tartrate were done. The yeast cells were exposed to different concentrations of arsenite. | ||
# What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid? | # What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid? | ||
− | # What media did they grow them in? What temperature? | + | #* The following yeast strains were used: |
− | # What controls did they use? | + | #** W303-1A |
+ | #** RW124 | ||
+ | #** CC849-1B | ||
+ | #** RW104 | ||
+ | #** YPDAHL1166 | ||
+ | # What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long? | ||
+ | #* The yeast was grown at 30 degrees Celsius in minimal YNB medium of 0.67% yeast nitrogen base, auxotrophic requirements, and 2% glucose or on SC medium. | ||
+ | # What controls did they use? | ||
+ | #* 18s rRNA was used for a control during Northern blot analysis | ||
+ | #* A culture of yeast unexposed to arsenite was used as a control when comparing GSH synthesis following arsenite exposure | ||
# How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint? | # How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint? | ||
− | # What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray? | + | #* The amount of replicates per treatment was not mentioned in the article. |
+ | # What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray? | ||
+ | #* The RNA was hybridized with 32P-labeled PCR fragments of ''MET3'', ''MET25'', and ''MET14''. | ||
# What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data? | # What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data? | ||
# Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site? | # Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site? | ||
− | #Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting. | + | # Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting. |
#* What do the X and Y axes represent? | #* What do the X and Y axes represent? | ||
#* How were the measurements made? | #* How were the measurements made? |
Revision as of 22:20, 13 November 2019
Contents
Links
Purpose
10 Words I Didn't Understand Before
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia - An aggressive type of acute myeloid leukemia in which there are too many immature blood-forming cells in the blood and bone marrow. It is usually marked by an exchange of parts of chromosomes 15 and 17. Also called APL and promyelocytic leukemia (NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms, 2008).
- Aquaglyceroporin - integral membrane proteins that are permeable to glycerol as well as water (Grosell, 2003).
- Chelation - the combination of a metal ion with a chemical compound, forming a ring (biology-online.org dictionary, 2014).
- Glutathionylation - the specific post-translational modification of protein cysteine residues by the addition of the tripeptide glutathione, the most abundant and important low-molecular-mass thiol within most cell types (Dalle-Donne, 2009).
- Auxotrophic - any strain of microorganism (alga, bacterium, or fungus) that differs from the wild‐type by requiring a supply of one or more growth factors (Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology).
- Orthologue - a gene, protein, or biopolymeric sequence that is evolutionarily related to another by descent from a common ancestor, having diverged as a result of a speciation event (Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology).
- Dichotomous - a term that describes dividing into two parts or classifications (biology-online.org dictionary, 2014).
- Antioxidant - any substance that inhibits oxidation, usually because it is preferentially oxidized itself (Lackie, 2007).
- Glutathione - most abundant non-protein thiol, synthesized in the cytosol, that protects against oxidative stress, and regulates cell proliferation, immune response, apoptosis, and fibrogenesis (Lu, 2012)
- Ubiquitination - formation of a highly efficient and selective isopeptide bond between a substrate lysine residue and the C-terminus of ubiquitin catalyzed by ubiquitin-protein ligase, or E3 (Pickart, 2001).
Article Outline
- What is the main result presented in this paper?
- This paper's main result was that cells responded to cellular arsenite acquisition by stimulating sulfur assimilation or glutathione biosynthesis pathways through the control of transcription factors Yap1p and Met4p. These results are found by transcriptome, proteome, and sulfur metabolite profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's response to arsenite.
- What is the importance or significance of this work?
- This work provides further information about the impact of arsenite on the environmental and human health. Due to its causative and curative properties for disease a more full understanding of global and specific responses can help development of medical therapies.
- What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work?
- Previous studies have not shown whether protein glutothionylation occurs in response to metals or not.
- How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?)
- Metal sensitivity assays using sodium arsenite, cadmium chloride, and potassium antimonyl tartrate were done. The yeast cells were exposed to different concentrations of arsenite.
- What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid?
- The following yeast strains were used:
- W303-1A
- RW124
- CC849-1B
- RW104
- YPDAHL1166
- The following yeast strains were used:
- What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long?
- The yeast was grown at 30 degrees Celsius in minimal YNB medium of 0.67% yeast nitrogen base, auxotrophic requirements, and 2% glucose or on SC medium.
- What controls did they use?
- 18s rRNA was used for a control during Northern blot analysis
- A culture of yeast unexposed to arsenite was used as a control when comparing GSH synthesis following arsenite exposure
- How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint?
- The amount of replicates per treatment was not mentioned in the article.
- What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray?
- The RNA was hybridized with 32P-labeled PCR fragments of MET3, MET25, and MET14.
- What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data?
- Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site?
- Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.
- What do the X and Y axes represent?
- How were the measurements made?
- What trends are shown by the plots and what conclusions can you draw from the data?
- How does this work compare with previous studies?
- What are the important implications of this work?
- What future directions should the authors take?
- Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?
Conclusion
References
(2006). auxotroph. In Cammack, R., Atwood, T., Campbell, P., Parish, H., Smith, A., Vella, F., & Stirling, J. (Eds.), Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. : Oxford University Press. Retrieved 12 Nov. 2019, from https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198529170.001.0001/acref-9780198529170-e-1807
Biology Online, BWB Marketing, 12 May 2014, https://www.biology-online.org/dictionary
Dalle-Donne, I., Rossi, R., Colombo, G., Giustarini, D., & Milzani, A. (2009). Protein S-glutathionylation: a regulatory device from bacteria to humans. Trends in biochemical sciences, 34(2), 85-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2008.11.002
Grosell, M., & Bury, N. R. (2003). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)/Biomembranes: Preface. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes, 1618(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.10.004
Lackie, J. M., & Lackie, J. M. (Eds.). (2007). The dictionary of cell and molecular biology. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Lu, S. C. (2013). Glutathione synthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 1830(5), 3143-3153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.008
“NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms.” National Cancer Institute, 5 Apr. 2018, www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/.
Pickart, C. M. (2001). Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annual review of biochemistry, 70(1), 503-533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.503