Difference between revisions of "Jcowan4 Journal Week 11"

From LMU BioDB 2019
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(What is the main result presented in this paper?: started answering)
(References: and user template)
Line 60: Line 60:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
+
{{jcowan4}}
 
(*Participation: Table 1, Table 2, Introduction (Background Information), Question 1, Question 3)
 
(*Participation: Table 1, Table 2, Introduction (Background Information), Question 1, Question 3)

Revision as of 15:59, 12 November 2019

Biological Terms

Intracellular

Transcriptomic

Extracellular

Methionine

Biosynthesis

B-galactosidase

Homocysteine

Oxidative

Glutathione

Substrate

Transduction

Outline

What is the main result presented in this paper?

The main result found in the article was how the Saccharomyces cerevisiae short-term potassium deprivation causes a lack in potassium which causes alters sulfur metabolism

What is the importance or significance of this work?

What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work?

How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?)

What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid?

What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long?

What controls did they use?

How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint?

What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray?

What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data?

Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site?

Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.

  • What do the X and Y axes represent?
  • How were the measurements made?
  • What trends are shown by the plots and what conclusions can you draw from the data?

How does this work compare with previous studies?

What are the important implications of this work?

What future directions should the authors take?

Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?

Annotated Bibliography

Data/Files

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

References

Assignment Individual Journal Shared Journal
Week 1 jcowan4 Class Journal Week 1
Week 2 jcowan4 Journal Week 2 Class Journal Week 2
Week 3 FAS2 Week 3 Class Journal Week 3
Week 4 jcowan4 Journal Week 4 Class Journal Week 4
Week 5 iDog Week 5 Class Journal Week 5
Week 6 jcowan4 Journal Week 6 Class Journal Week 6
Week 7 jcowan4 Journal Week 7 Class Journal Week 7
Week 8 jcowan4 Journal Week 8 Class Journal Week 8
Week 9 jcowan4 Journal Week 9 Class Journal Week 9
Week 10 jcowan4 Journal Week 10 Class Journal Week 10
Week 11 jcowan4 Journal Week 11 Skinny Genes
Week 12/13 Skinny Genes Quality Assurance Skinny Genes
Week 15 jcowan4 Journal Week 15 Class Journal Week 15

Misc. Links

(*Participation: Table 1, Table 2, Introduction (Background Information), Question 1, Question 3)