Difference between revisions of "Jcowan4 Journal Week 11"
(→Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.: partially answered) |
(→Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.: answering) |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
===Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.=== | ===Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.=== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Table 1''' shows the transcriptional changes between 10, 20, 40, 60, and 120 minutes. It measures the amount of genes that are induced and repressed at each timepoint. | '''Table 1''' shows the transcriptional changes between 10, 20, 40, 60, and 120 minutes. It measures the amount of genes that are induced and repressed at each timepoint. | ||
Line 99: | Line 94: | ||
'''Figure 4''' shows the effects of methylglyoxal production and treholse production from potassium starvation. '''A''' shows how the production of each is made. '''B''' shows the changes in expression '''X''' = Timepoint '''Y''' = Changes in expression (-fold). '''C''' shows the levels of methyglyoxal when affected by potassium starvation. '''X''' = Timepoint '''Y''' = Methyglyoxal Levels. | '''Figure 4''' shows the effects of methylglyoxal production and treholse production from potassium starvation. '''A''' shows how the production of each is made. '''B''' shows the changes in expression '''X''' = Timepoint '''Y''' = Changes in expression (-fold). '''C''' shows the levels of methyglyoxal when affected by potassium starvation. '''X''' = Timepoint '''Y''' = Methyglyoxal Levels. | ||
− | '''Figure 5''' shows the a correlation between the expression of CIT2 and DLD3 genes and potassium starvation. '''A''' shows the changes in expression for genes and an image of the changes in CIT2, DLD3 and ACT1. '''B''' shows the changes in mitochondrial change before and after the procedure and images of WT and fzo1. '''C''' | + | '''Figure 5''' shows the a correlation between the expression of CIT2 and DLD3 genes and potassium starvation. '''A''' shows the changes in expression for genes and an image of the changes in CIT2, DLD3 and ACT1. '''B''' shows the changes in mitochondrial change before and after the procedure and images of WT and fzo1. '''C''' & '''D''' shows the graph depicting the relative concentration of intracellular ammonium after treatment. |
− | '''Figure 6''' | + | '''Figure 6''' shows expression of genes controlling cyclins express various responses to potassium starvation. '''A''' shows a graph demonstrating the change in expression levels of retrograde after potassium starvation. '''X''' = Timepoint '''Y''' = log2 change in expression levels. '''B''' are images depicting relative abundance of cyclin mRNA & '''C''' are images depicting relative abundance of cyclin protein |
− | '''Figure 7''' | + | '''Figure 7''' shows that potassium starvation decreases septin ring formation. '''A''' shows a graph that represents the change in expression levels of septin ring fomration genes after potassium starvation. '''B''' are images depicting the localization of Cdc11-GFP during treatment. '''C''' are images depicting relative abundance of Cdc11 protein. '''D''' are images depicting the localization of Cdc11 protein |
===How does this work compare with previous studies?=== | ===How does this work compare with previous studies?=== |
Revision as of 21:50, 13 November 2019
Contents
- 1 Biological Terms
- 2 Outline
- 2.1 What is the main result presented in this paper?
- 2.2 What is the importance or significance of this work?
- 2.3 What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work?
- 2.4 How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?)
- 2.5 What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid?
- 2.6 What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long?
- 2.7 What controls did they use?
- 2.8 How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint?
- 2.9 What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray?
- 2.10 What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data?
- 2.11 Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site?
- 2.12 Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.
- 2.13 How does this work compare with previous studies?
- 2.14 What are the important implications of this work?
- 2.15 What future directions should the authors take?
- 2.16 Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?
- 3 Annotated Bibliography
- 4 Data/Files
- 5 Conclusion
- 6 Acknowledgements
- 7 References
Biological Terms
Intracellular
Transcriptomic
Extracellular
Methionine
Biosynthesis
B-galactosidase
Homocysteine
Oxidative
Glutathione
Substrate
Transduction
Outline
What is the main result presented in this paper?
The main result found in the article was how the Saccharomyces cerevisiae short-term potassium deprivation causes a lack of potassium which affects and changes sulfur metabolism. This leads to an oxidative stress response and activates the retrograde pathway. It is stated that the catalyst could possibly be ammonium accumulation that happens through the Trk1 potassium transporter. Other results include: a halt in gene expression required for ribosome biogenesis and translation, a decrease in the expression of diverse components used in the progression of cell cycle and blockage in septins assembly. Essentially, a shortage of potassium in the environment triggers an acute transcriptional response, which opens up new finds and more areas to be explored.
What is the importance or significance of this work?
The significance of this work is the new discoveries and pathways involving potassium and its role in cellular life.
What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work?
There were no previous studies that directly correlate to this work. However, there are multiple studies that are able to supplement the work.
How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?)
The yeast cells were put into a YBN growth medium that lacked normal amounts of potassium and ammonium (potassium starvation). The cells were recorded and monitored in time intervals of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60 and 120 minutes.
What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid?
Strains:
- YNR055.1
- YPC722, YPC723, YPC724,
- BY4741, BY4741 rtg2, BY4741 rtg3, BY4741 fzo1
- BYT1, BYT2, BYT12
- W303-1A
- DBY746
(*The information regarding the if they were haploid or diploid wa not given)
What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long?
- Grown in translucent potassium-free YNB media
- Temperature: 28 Celsius
- Incubator: N/A
- The times used were 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes
What controls did they use?
Controls: wild-type strain BY4741, 50mM KCI added
How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint?
4 Replicates per timepoint
What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray?
RNA extraction using the Ribo Pure™-Yeast kit
What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data?
They used GEPAS v3.1
Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site?
The data could be found at Society for Applied Microbiology
Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.
Table 1 shows the transcriptional changes between 10, 20, 40, 60, and 120 minutes. It measures the amount of genes that are induced and repressed at each timepoint.
Table 2 shows a list of strains that were used.
Figure 1 shows that the majority of genes were induced/repressed between 60-120 minutes after being transferred to a potassium free media. X = Timepoint Y = Genes
Figure 2 (A) shows the how potassium starvation decreases sulfuric amino acid metabolism. This is seen in the model that depicts the how Met/Cys are metabolized. B is a graph that shows mRna concentration from the microarray X = mRna change Y = Genes. C shows the concentration of Met and Cys after the procedure. X = Timepoint Y = Genes (Met/Cys)
Figure 3 shows the oxidative stress response in genes due to potassium deprivation. A shows the multiple genes reacting to potassium deprivation and is measured by the levels of oxidative stress. B shows images of the genes responding to the procedure. Y = Time intervals. C shows the change in Glutanione level due to potassium starvation.
Figure 4 shows the effects of methylglyoxal production and treholse production from potassium starvation. A shows how the production of each is made. B shows the changes in expression X = Timepoint Y = Changes in expression (-fold). C shows the levels of methyglyoxal when affected by potassium starvation. X = Timepoint Y = Methyglyoxal Levels.
Figure 5 shows the a correlation between the expression of CIT2 and DLD3 genes and potassium starvation. A shows the changes in expression for genes and an image of the changes in CIT2, DLD3 and ACT1. B shows the changes in mitochondrial change before and after the procedure and images of WT and fzo1. C & D shows the graph depicting the relative concentration of intracellular ammonium after treatment.
Figure 6 shows expression of genes controlling cyclins express various responses to potassium starvation. A shows a graph demonstrating the change in expression levels of retrograde after potassium starvation. X = Timepoint Y = log2 change in expression levels. B are images depicting relative abundance of cyclin mRNA & C are images depicting relative abundance of cyclin protein
Figure 7 shows that potassium starvation decreases septin ring formation. A shows a graph that represents the change in expression levels of septin ring fomration genes after potassium starvation. B are images depicting the localization of Cdc11-GFP during treatment. C are images depicting relative abundance of Cdc11 protein. D are images depicting the localization of Cdc11 protein
How does this work compare with previous studies?
No other previous works.
What are the important implications of this work?
The important implications of this work are understanding the results from potassium starvation and how it opens up a new study regarding cations starvation or the relationship of cations and cellular life.
What future directions should the authors take?
The authors should try to understand how potassium affects other cations or how potassium affects other objects aside from yeast.
Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?
The author's data supported their conclusion and could be seen when they used analyzing the figures and tables. However, the paper was extremely dense and required more research in order to understand the procedure and results.
Annotated Bibliography
- Use a keyword search for the first three databases/tools and answer the following:
- PubMed
- What original keyword(s) did you use? How many results did you get?
- Which terms in which combinations were most useful to narrow down the search? How many results did you get after narrowing the search?
- Google Scholar
- What original keyword(s) did you use? How many results did you get?
- Which terms in which combinations were most useful to narrow down the search? How many results did you get after narrowing the search?
- Web of Science
- What original keyword(s) did you use? How many results did you get?
- Which terms in which combinations were most useful to narrow down the search? How many results did you get after narrowing the search?
- PubMed
- Use the advanced search functions for each of these three databases/tools and answer the following:
- PubMed
- Which advanced search functions were most useful to narrow down the search? How many results did you get?
- Google Scholar
- Which advanced search functions were most useful to narrow down the search? How many results did you get?
- Web of Science
- Which advanced search functions were most useful to narrow down the search? How many results did you get?
- Perform a prospective search on your article in the Web of Science and answer the following:
- How many articles does this article cite?
- How many articles cite this article?
- PubMed
- Use a keyword search for the first three databases/tools and answer the following:
Data/Files
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
This week we were put into teams. The team I was assigned to was Team Skinny Genes. The other members are Mihir Samdars, Aby Mesfin, David Ramirez, Christina Dominguez. We worked in and out of class together Monday and Wednesday.
"Except for what is noted above, this individual journal entry was completed by me and not copied from another source."
References
Misc. Links
(*Participation: Table 2, Introduction (Background Information), Question 1, Question 3)