Difference between revisions of "Vkuehn Week 11"
From LMU BioDB 2013
(summary complete) |
|||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
*Enzymes that catalyze these modifications may be promising drug targets | *Enzymes that catalyze these modifications may be promising drug targets | ||
'''Surface Molecules''' | '''Surface Molecules''' | ||
+ | *Surface molecules of Leishmania is important because of its role in the infectious cycle in the host. | ||
+ | *:Many of the anchored proteins contain similar posttranslational modifications but vary in other ways both within the Leishmania species and between Tritryps | ||
+ | *Many of the functions of the identified genes have not been determined | ||
+ | *Genes that result in nucleotide sugar transporters and their roles have been found to be unique in L. major | ||
+ | *Sphingolipids= essential membrane components in eukaryotic cells, contribute to intracellular function | ||
+ | **Primary sphingolipid in Tritryps is IPC -->could be a drug target because of its role in intracellular function | ||
+ | '''Proteolysis''' | ||
+ | *Some peptidase protein-coding genes have been found to be virulence factors in Tritryps | ||
+ | *: Potential vaccine and drug targets | ||
+ | *No representatives of mammalian peptidase inhibitors were found | ||
+ | *:But have IPCs that mammals lack, suggesting these play important role in host-parasite interaction | ||
+ | *Tritryps also contain inhibitors of serine peptidases (ISPs) that are normally only found in bacteria | ||
+ | *: ISPs also likely play an important role in host-parasite interactions | ||
+ | '''Concluding Remarks''' | ||
+ | *Comparing genomic sequences of tritryps helps gain insight into possible locations for drug targeting | ||
+ | *Its similarities, and divergences in genome organization and replication to both bacterial and eukaryotic cells also provides information regarding eukaryotic evolution | ||
+ | *The availability of the entire L. major genome and the subsequent analysis of the protein-coding genes is important in further researching their role in virulence | ||
+ | *This brings up possibilities for drug intervention and a better understanding of the mechanisms of the parasites' entrance into the host macrophage and its disease pathology | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
{{Template:Vkuehn}} | {{Template:Vkuehn}} | ||
[[Category:Journal Entry]] | [[Category:Journal Entry]] | ||
[[Category:Leishmania Major]] | [[Category:Leishmania Major]] |
Revision as of 08:15, 11 November 2013
Journal Club Preparation: Leishmania Major
Genome Reference Paper: The Genome of the Kinetoplastid Parasite, Leishmania major (Reference Genome)
10 Biological Terms
Article Outline
Introduction
- It is important to study the genome of Leishmania major because of the various human diseases that this parasite is capable of causing. If infected by a leishmania parasite a number of diseases can form. Annually there are 2 million cases in 88 tropical and subtropical countries.
- How it infects:
- Parasite transmitted by sand flies as proliferative promastigote
- Differentiate into nondividing forms before inoculation into vertebrate host
- In host macrophages, phagocytose metacyclics --> differentiate into amastigotes (proliferate in phagolysosome)
- Leads to host macrophage lysis and infection of other macrophages
- Outcome of infection depends on species, host immune system and host genetics
- Interesting to look at genome because of the unique mechanism of regulating transcription which is atypical for eukaryotes
- Leishmania major is considered an "Old World Leishmania" species, meaning it contains 36 chromosome pairs. There are approximately 30 Leishmania species who's gene order is highly conserved.
- Ways in which it differs:
- Organization of protein coding genes: long, strand-specific polycistronic clusters
- No transcription factors
- This article determined the genome sequence of Leishmania major on a chromosome by chromosome basis. Present the structure and content based on molecular processes such as:
- chromatin remodeling
- transcription
- RNA processing
- Translation
- posttranslational modification
- protein turnover
- Also discuss essential host parasite interface developmental processes
Genome Structure and Content
- 32,816,678 base pairs obtained by shotgun sequencing insert colonies and purified chromosomal DNA
- Genome is partially aneuploid
- L. major sequence analysis yielded 911 RNA genes, 39 pseudogenes, 8272 protein coding genes
- L. major telomeres distinct from other Trityps and have heterogeneous structure
- The end of Leishmania major chromosomes have tripartite "repeat-repeat" structure
- "Leichmania restricted" genes: responsible for metablic differences from T. brucei and T. cruzi found randomly distributed in genome
- Two genes of interest: LmjF33.1740 and LmjF33.1750
- Because resulting proteins contain macrophage migration inhibition factor (MIF)
- Homologues found in other Leishmania species
- L. major MIFs thought to retain tautomerase activity, but dies not have oxidoreductase activity.
- Interesting because this ties it to eukaryotic similarities but also ties genes to bacteria
- Suggests that L. major MIFs could use eukaryotic similarities to modulate host macrophage response and help them survive in the host
RNA Genes
- RNAs participate in many cellular processes:
- RNA replication, splicing, RNA processing and modification, translation, translation regulation, protein translocation across membranes
- Differences in organization of RNA genes in genomes of L. major and the other trypanosomes.
- All 3 tritryp genomes have different numbers of genes and location differs as well.
Chromatin Remodeling
- Trypanosomatids have multiple copies of 4 core histone genes
- package chromosomal DNA into nucleosomes in eukaryotes and the access is also regulated by the RNA polytranscription complexes.
- Most genes are clustered in discrete single tandem arrays. L. major is different in this sense because these gene types occur in 2 or more separate loci, which is not the case for the other tritryps.
- Some variants in histone complexes in L. major may play roles in:
- gene slicing, gene expression, DNA repair, and centromere function
- Trytrip parasites have typical chromatin remodeling activities of eukaryotes, but also have some significan differences.
Transcription
- Little is known about the mechanisms of transcription initiation and few promoters have been analyzed in trypanosomatids
- The chromosome is characterized by the unique arrangement of directional gene clusters:
- Polycistronic transcription by RNA polymerase II initiates bidirectionality within divergent strand-switch regions
- Terminates within convergent strand switch regions
- Tritryps have conserved protein subunits. The difference between the species is that in L. major many of the homologues for RNA polymerase specific subunits are absent.
- Few potential homologues of RNA polymerase II basal transcription factors were found in L. major that were present in other eukaryotes.
- Findings show that primary determinants of tritryp gene expression is via posttranscriptional control mechanisms.
RNA Processing
- Tritryp RNA processing is distinctive because the site of polyadenylation is determined by trans-splicing of downstream mRNA
- Identified many putative tritryp splicing regulatory proteins and proteins implicated in alternative splicing. These suggest that regulation of splicing may have arisen early in eukaryotic evolution
- There is an absence of an RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain which may have a distinct functional role in transcription
- Degradation of mRNAs in regulating gene expression is similar to the process in mammals (the exosome plays a dominant role)
- The number of RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) is similar in Tritryps and yeast proteins
Translation and co-/posttranslational modification
- Major components of translational machinery found in L. major aslo found in other lower eukaryotes
- There is a higher number of potential translation factors in Tritryps which suggests that there is a high degree of specialization
- Most protein modification within tritryps involves usual eukaryotic processes. But there are some essential modificationsin L. major:
- glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor addition, acylation, and prenylation
- all facilitate membrane attachment and/or protein-protein interactions
- Enzymes that catalyze these modifications may be promising drug targets
Surface Molecules
- Surface molecules of Leishmania is important because of its role in the infectious cycle in the host.
- Many of the anchored proteins contain similar posttranslational modifications but vary in other ways both within the Leishmania species and between Tritryps
- Many of the functions of the identified genes have not been determined
- Genes that result in nucleotide sugar transporters and their roles have been found to be unique in L. major
- Sphingolipids= essential membrane components in eukaryotic cells, contribute to intracellular function
- Primary sphingolipid in Tritryps is IPC -->could be a drug target because of its role in intracellular function
Proteolysis
- Some peptidase protein-coding genes have been found to be virulence factors in Tritryps
- Potential vaccine and drug targets
- No representatives of mammalian peptidase inhibitors were found
- But have IPCs that mammals lack, suggesting these play important role in host-parasite interaction
- Tritryps also contain inhibitors of serine peptidases (ISPs) that are normally only found in bacteria
- ISPs also likely play an important role in host-parasite interactions
Concluding Remarks
- Comparing genomic sequences of tritryps helps gain insight into possible locations for drug targeting
- Its similarities, and divergences in genome organization and replication to both bacterial and eukaryotic cells also provides information regarding eukaryotic evolution
- The availability of the entire L. major genome and the subsequent analysis of the protein-coding genes is important in further researching their role in virulence
- This brings up possibilities for drug intervention and a better understanding of the mechanisms of the parasites' entrance into the host macrophage and its disease pathology
- Template:vkuehn
- Viktoria Kuehn
- Week 1 Assignment
- Class Journal 1
- Week 2 Assignment
- Class Journal 2
- Vkuehn Week 2
- Week 3 Assignment
- Class Journal 3
- Vkuehn Week 3
- Week 4 Assignment
- Class Journal 4
- Vkuehn Week 4
- Week 5 Assignment
- Vkuehn Week 5
- Ensembl Database
- Week 6 Assignment
- Class Journal 6
- Vkuehn Week 6
- Week 7 Assignment
- Class Journal 7
- Vkuehn Week 7
- Week 8 Assignment
- Class Journal 8
- Vkuehn Week 8
- Leishmania major
- Week 9 Assignment
- Class Journal 9
- Vkuehn Week 9
- Week 10 Assignment
- Class Journal 10
- Vkuehn Week 10
- Leishmania major
- Week 11 Assignment
- Vkuehn Week 11
- Leishmania major Genome Reference Article Presentation
- Vkuehn Week 12
- Week 12 Assignment
- Leishmania major Week 12 Status Report
- Vkuehn Week 13
- Week 13 Assignment
- Vkuehn Week 15
- Week 15 Assignment
- Vkuehn Individual Assessment and Reflection