Difference between revisions of "The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database"
From LMU BioDB 2017
(fixing format) |
(adding header) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Database Information == | ||
* '''General information about the database''' | * '''General information about the database''' | ||
*# What is the name of the database? (link to the home page) | *# What is the name of the database? (link to the home page) | ||
| Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
*# Would you direct a colleague unfamiliar with the field to use it? | *# Would you direct a colleague unfamiliar with the field to use it? | ||
*# Is this a professional or hobby database? | *# Is this a professional or hobby database? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=== Acknowledgements === | === Acknowledgements === | ||
| Line 52: | Line 51: | ||
LMU BioDB 2017. (2017). Week 1. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2017/index.php/Week_1 | LMU BioDB 2017. (2017). Week 1. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2017/index.php/Week_1 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{Template:Cazinge}} | {{Template:Cazinge}} | ||
{{Template:Mbalducc}} | {{Template:Mbalducc}} | ||
Revision as of 04:04, 3 October 2017
Contents
Database Information
- General information about the database
- What is the name of the database? (link to the home page)
- What type (or types) of database is it?
- What biological information (type of data) does it contain? (sequence, structure, model organism, or specialty [what?])
- What type of data source does it have?
- primary versus secondary ("meta")
- curated versus non-curated
- electronic versus human curation
- in-house staff versus community curation
- What individual or organization maintains the database?
- public versus private
- large national or multinational entity or small lab group
- What is their funding source(s)?
- Scientific quality of the database
- Does the content appear to completely cover its content domain?
- How many records does the database contain?
- What claims do the database owners make about coverage in the corresponding paper?
- What species are covered in the database?
- Is the database content useful? I.e., what biological questions can it be used to answer?
- Is the database content timely?
- Is there a need in the scientific community for such a database at this time?
- Is the content covered by other databases already?
- When did the database first go online?
- How often is the database updated?
- When was the last update?
- Does the content appear to completely cover its content domain?
- General utility of the database to the scientific community
- Are there links to other databases? Which ones?
- Is it convenient to browse the data?
- Is it convenient to download the data?
- In what file formats are the data provided?
- Are they standard or non-standard formats?
- Evaluate the “user-friendliness” of the database: can a naive user quickly navigate the website and gather useful information?
- Is the website well-organized?
- Does it have a help section or tutorial?
- Are the search options sensible?
- Run a sample query. Do the results make sense?
- Access: Is there a license agreement or any restrictions on access to the database?
- Summary judgment
- Would you direct a colleague unfamiliar with the field to use it?
- Is this a professional or hobby database?
Acknowledgements
The two of us met outside of class on two separate occasions, and worked on two separate parts of the information gathering part of the assignment individually. Cazinge handled the first two sections, while Mbalducc took care of the other two. While we worked together to complete this assignment, this database page was completed by us and not copied from another source. Cazinge (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2017 (PDT)
References
LMU BioDB 2017. (2017). Week 1. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2017/index.php/Week_1
My Links
Other Pages
Individual Journals
No Assignment Week 13
Assignments
No Assignment Week 13
