Difference between revisions of "Cdomin12 Week 9"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Methods/Results: answered questions) |
(→Profile 48: added bold) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Methods/Results== | ==Methods/Results== | ||
===Profile 48=== | ===Profile 48=== | ||
| − | + | ====Why did you select this profile? In other words, why was it interesting to you?==== | |
It has an upward and then downward trend, which I thought would be interesting to investigate at the different time points in how it related to cold shock. | It has an upward and then downward trend, which I thought would be interesting to investigate at the different time points in how it related to cold shock. | ||
| − | + | ====How many genes belong to this profile?==== | |
77 genes | 77 genes | ||
| − | + | ====How many genes were expected to belong to this profile?==== | |
36.7 expected genes | 36.7 expected genes | ||
| − | + | ====What is the p value for the enrichment of genes in this profile?==== | |
2.7E-9 | 2.7E-9 | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 28 October 2019
Purpose
Methods/Results
Profile 48
Why did you select this profile? In other words, why was it interesting to you?
It has an upward and then downward trend, which I thought would be interesting to investigate at the different time points in how it related to cold shock.
How many genes belong to this profile?
77 genes
How many genes were expected to belong to this profile?
36.7 expected genes
What is the p value for the enrichment of genes in this profile?
2.7E-9
