Difference between revisions of "Cdomin12 Week 11"

From LMU BioDB 2019
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Acknowledgments)
(→‎19. Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?: added adv and disadv)
Line 54: Line 54:
  
 
====19. Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?====
 
====19. Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?====
 +
 +
==Annotated Bibliography==
 +
===Reflect===
 +
====1.What impact does the choice of keywords have on your results?====
 +
 +
====2.What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of the three databases (Pubmed, Google Scholar, Web of Science)?====
 +
*Google Scholar: Disadvantages include limited capability of narrowing down search and not including DOI number in citations. Advantages include formatted citations
 +
*Pubmed:
 +
*Web of Science*
  
 
==Acknowledgments==
 
==Acknowledgments==

Revision as of 15:05, 12 November 2019

User Page

template: cdomin12

Assignment Page Individual Journal Entries Class Journal
Week 1 cdomin12 Week 1 Class Journal Week 1
Week 2 cdomin12 Week 2 Class Journal Week 2
Week 3 RAD53 / YPL153C Week 3 Class Journal Week 3
Week 4 cdomin12 Week 4 Class Journal Week 4
Week 5 IMG/VR Week 5 Class Journal Week 5
Week 6 cdomin12 Week 6 Class Journal Week 6
Week 7 cdomin12 Week 7 Class Journal Week 7
Week 8 cdomin12 Week 8 Class Journal Week 8
Week 9 cdomin12 Week 9 Class Journal Week 9
Week 10 cdomin12 Week 10 Class Journal Week 10
Week 11 cdomin12 Week 11 Skinny Genes
Week 12/13 Skinny Genes Quality Assurance Skinny Genes
Week 15 Skinny Genes Deliverables Skinny Genes

Contents

1. Ten Biological Terms

2. Outline of Article

1. What is the main result presented in this paper?

2. What is the importance or significance of this work?

3. What were the limitations in previous studies that led them to perform this work?

4. How did they treat the yeast cells (what experiment were they doing?)

5. What strain(s) of yeast did they use? Were the strain(s) haploid or diploid?

6. What media did they grow them in? What temperature? What type of incubator? For how long?

7. What controls did they use?

8. How many replicates did they perform per treatment or timepoint?

9. What method did they use to prepare the RNA, label it and hybridize it to the microarray?

10. What mathematical/statistical method did they use to analyze the data?

11. Are the data publicly available for download? From which web site?

12. Briefly state the result shown in each of the figures and tables, not just the ones you are presenting.

Figure 4: (A) This demonstrates the effect of methylglyoxal production as well as trehalose metabolism from potassium starvation. (B) Two graphs (x axis- time in min and y axis- changes in expression fold) shows the change in expression specifically for genes related to trehalose metabolism and methylglyoxal. Measurements were made through the microarray data. (C) A graph (x axis- time in min and y axis- methylglyoxal concentration) showing MG levels remaining higher after 20 minutes potentially linked to genes induced in trehalose metabolism.

13. What do the X and Y axes represent?

14. How were the measurements made?

15. What trends are shown by the plots and what conclusions can you draw from the data?

16. How does this work compare with previous studies?

17. What are the important implications of this work?

18. What future directions should the authors take?

19. Give a critical evaluation of how well you think the authors supported their conclusions with the data they showed. Are there any major flaws to the paper?

Annotated Bibliography

Reflect

1.What impact does the choice of keywords have on your results?

2.What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of the three databases (Pubmed, Google Scholar, Web of Science)?

  • Google Scholar: Disadvantages include limited capability of narrowing down search and not including DOI number in citations. Advantages include formatted citations
  • Pubmed:
  • Web of Science*

Acknowledgments

1. I worked with User:ymesfin, User:Jcowan4, User:msamdars, and User:dramir36 for this assignment.

2."Except for what is noted above, this individual journal entry was completed by me and not copied from another source." Cdomin12 (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2019 (PST)

References

Retrieved from "https://xmlpipedb.lmucs.io/biodb/fall2019/index.php?title=Cdomin12_Week_11&oldid=6411"