Difference between revisions of "RNAct Week 5"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→General Information of the Database: added answers) |
(→General Information of the Database: added answers) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#*** It is a [https://rnact.crg.eu/about secondary source]. | #*** It is a [https://rnact.crg.eu/about secondary source]. | ||
#**'''curated versus non-curated?''' | #**'''curated versus non-curated?''' | ||
| − | #*** | + | #***Curated |
#**'''if curated, is it electronic versus human curation?''' | #**'''if curated, is it electronic versus human curation?''' | ||
| − | #*** | + | #***Electronically curated |
#'''What individual or organization maintains the database?''' | #'''What individual or organization maintains the database?''' | ||
#*'''public versus private''' | #*'''public versus private''' | ||
| + | #**Private | ||
#*'''large national or multinational entity or small lab group''' | #*'''large national or multinational entity or small lab group''' | ||
| + | #**Small lab group | ||
#'''What is their funding source(s)?''' | #'''What is their funding source(s)?''' | ||
| + | #*Their funding source comes from [https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/what-horizon-2020 Horizon 2020]. It is an EU research and innovation program that has funds lasting from 2014-2020. | ||
== Scientific Quality of the Database == | == Scientific Quality of the Database == | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 29 September 2019
Contents
General Information of the Database
- What is the name of the database? (link to the home page)
- The name of the database is RNAct
- What type (or types) of database is it?
- What biological information (type of data) does it contain? (sequence, structure, model organism, or specialty [what?])
- The biological information that it contains deals with structure of proteins and the RNAs itself. It involves predictions/interactions with over 5 million genomes of humans, mouse, and yeast.
- What type of data source does it have?
- primary versus secondary ("meta")?
- It is a secondary source.
- curated versus non-curated?
- Curated
- if curated, is it electronic versus human curation?
- Electronically curated
- primary versus secondary ("meta")?
- What biological information (type of data) does it contain? (sequence, structure, model organism, or specialty [what?])
- What individual or organization maintains the database?
- public versus private
- Private
- large national or multinational entity or small lab group
- Small lab group
- public versus private
- What is their funding source(s)?
- Their funding source comes from Horizon 2020. It is an EU research and innovation program that has funds lasting from 2014-2020.
Scientific Quality of the Database
- Does the content appear to completely cover its content domain?
- How many records does the database contain?
- What claims do the database owners make about coverage in the corresponding paper?
- What species are covered in the database? (If it is a very long list, summarize.)
- Is the database content useful? I.e., what biological questions can it be used to answer?
- Is the database content timely?
- Is there a need in the scientific community for such a database at this time?
- Is the content covered by other databases already?
- How current is the database?
- When did the database first go online?
- How often is the database updated?
- When was the last update?
General Utility of the Database to the Scientific Community
- Are there links to other databases? Which ones?
- Is it convenient to browse the data?
- Is it convenient to download the data?
- In what file formats are the data provided?
- What type of files, indicated by the file extension (e.g., .txt, .xml., etc.)?
- Are they standard or non-standard formats? (i.e., are they following an approved standard for that type of data)?
- In what file formats are the data provided?
- Evaluate the “user-friendliness” of the database: can a naive user quickly navigate the website and gather useful information?
- Is the website well-organized?
- Does it have a help section or tutorial?
- Are the search options sensible?
- Run a sample query. Do the results make sense?
- Access: Is there a license agreement or any restrictions on access to the database?
Summary Judgment
- Would you direct a colleague unfamiliar with the field to use it?
- Is this a professional or "hobby" database? The "hobby" analogy means that it was that person's hobby to make the database. It could mean that it is limited in scope, done by one or a few persons, and seems amateur.
Database Powerpoint Presentation
Acknowledgements
- This week's journal was completed by Marcus Avila and Iliana Crespin
- Homework partners messaged and consulted on how much contribution each person was going to put in this assignment
- "Except for what is noted above, this individual journal entry was completed by me and not copied from another source."Icrespin (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2019 (PDT)
References
Week 5 Assignment page is: LMU BioDB 2019. (2019). Week 5. Retrieved September 29, 2019 from https://xmlpipedb.cs.lmu.edu/biodb/fall2019/index.php/Week_5
