Difference between revisions of "Sulfiknights"

From LMU BioDB 2019
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Ivy Macaraeg: added my response)
(Marcus Avila)
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
===Marcus Avila===
 
===Marcus Avila===
 +
# What worked?
 +
#* The team dynamic and communication worked out very well. I feel that we each did our part and were even able to help each other out in some places.
 +
# What didn't work?
 +
#* I believe the amount of time given to complete the individual outline and group presentation was insufficient.
 +
# What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
 +
#* Next time I will allocate more time to the assignment.
 +
 
===DeLisa Madere===
 
===DeLisa Madere===
  

Revision as of 00:15, 14 November 2019

Sulfiknight Links
BIOL Databases Main Page Sulfiknights: Project Overview Page Final Project Deliverables Requirements Sulfiknights: Final Project Deliverables Members Project Manager & Quality Assurance: Naomi Tesfaiohannes Quality Assurance: Joey Nimmers-Minor Data Analysis: Ivy-Quynh Macaraeg & Marcus Avila Designer: DeLisa Madere
Assignment Pages Week 11 Week 12/13 Week 15

Template:Sulfiknights

Data/Files

Journal Club Presentation 11/14/19

Team Feedback

Naomi Tesfaiohannes

Each team member should reflect on the team's progress:

  • What worked?

Breaking up the sections of the paper to understand the transcription factors and cells affected by the arsenite exposure.

  • What didn't work?

My time management due to other coursework

  • What will I do next to fix what didn't work?

Have a better control of what work I put in each day for this assignment

Ntesfaio (talk) 00:08, 14 November 2019 (PST)

Joey Nimmers-Minor

  • What worked?

Dividing up responsibilities and meeting in person in order to avoid missed texts and simply make communication simpler and smoother.

  • What didn't work?

Waiting until the last minute to do the assignment because every member of the team had tests to get through this week

  • What will I do next to fix what didn't work?

I'll make sure to begin the assignments much sooner and communicate responsibilities with the rest of my team pomtply so we don't have to worry about rushing/procrastinating regardless of what assignments or tests we have the next week.

Jnimmers (talk) 00:08, 14 November 2019 (PST)

Marcus Avila

  1. What worked?
    • The team dynamic and communication worked out very well. I feel that we each did our part and were even able to help each other out in some places.
  2. What didn't work?
    • I believe the amount of time given to complete the individual outline and group presentation was insufficient.
  3. What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    • Next time I will allocate more time to the assignment.

DeLisa Madere

What Worked?

  • Being able to come together as a group and collaborate our ideas of the paper really allowed us to efficiently break up the work. We all assisted each other if we needed help.

What didn't work?

  • This week there was a lot of work going into this assignment along with the tests we have had from our other class, so we did not have a great amount of delegated time due to the workload.

What will I do next to fix what didn't work?

  • Next time, there will not be any other tests, therefore, more time can be delegated to this assignment.

Ivy Macaraeg

  • What worked?
    -I think we worked together well, even under pressure. We were able to coordinate with each other and help each other out.
  • What didn't work?
    -All of us were under a lot of pressure concerning other classes, so the amount of time we had to come together and work on this project was limited. Therefore, what didn't work was the timing we had to complete it.
  • What will I do next to fix what didn't work?
    -Next time, I will try to get ahead on my individual page more, so that I will be able to allocate more time to group areas.

Imacarae (talk) 00:12, 14 November 2019 (PST)

Annotated Bibliography Sources

DeLisa Madere

1. Ibstedt, S., Sideri, T. C., Grant, C. M., & Tamás, M. J. (2014). Global analysis of protein aggregation in yeast during physiological conditions and arsenite stress. Biology open, 3(10), 913-923. doi: 10.1242/bio.20148938

2. Sanchez, Y., Taulien, J., Borkovich, K. A., & Lindquist, S. (1992). Hsp104 is required for tolerance to many forms of stress. The EMBO journal, 11(6), 2357-2364. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05295.x

Naomi Tesfaiohannes

1. Zhou, X., Arita, A., Ellen, T. P., Liu, X., Bai, J., Rooney, J. P., ... & Costa, M. (2009). A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals pathways affected by arsenic toxicity. Genomics, 94(5), 294-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.07.003

2. Tsai, S. L., Singh, S., & Chen, W. (2009). Arsenic metabolism by microbes in nature and the impact on arsenic remediation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 20(6), 659-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2009.09.013

Ivy Macaraeg

1. Tripathi, P., & Tripathi, R. D. (2019). Metabolome Modulation During Arsenic Stress in Plants. In Plant-Metal Interactions (pp. 119-140). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20732-8_7

2. Khullar, S., & Sudhakara Reddy, M. (2019). Cadmium and arsenic responses in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor: glutathione metabolism and its role in metal (loid) homeostasis. Environmental microbiology reports, 11(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12712

References

  • Thorsen, M., Lagniel, G., Kristiansson, E., Junot, C., Nerman, O., Labarre, J., & Tamás, M. J. (2007). Quantitative transcriptome, proteome, and sulfur metabolite profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to arsenite. Physiological genomics, 30(1), 35-43. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00236.2006